Steve's Digicams Forums

Steve's Digicams Forums (https://forums.steves-digicams.com/)
-   Nikon Lenses (https://forums.steves-digicams.com/nikon-lenses-62/)
-   -   Nikkor AF300mm f4 ED-IF lens (https://forums.steves-digicams.com/nikon-lenses-62/nikkor-af300mm-f4-ed-if-lens-200982/)

zig-123 Aug 13, 2012 9:24 AM

Nikkor AF300mm f4 ED-IF lens
 
I recently decided to purchase a prime 300mm f4 lens. But, given the amount of usage I knew I would give it, did not want to spring for the latest version which can be had on the used market for about $1000.

So, instead decided to take a chance on an older version AF300mm f4 lens with IF-ED which I ended up purchasing at KEH.com for about $459.00.

In a nutshell, I'm not disappointed. While the AF is no barn burner, the clarity of this lens is pretty darned good.

Here is an example of what I mean:

Water Lily at normal magnification:

http://zig123.smugmug.com/photos/i-6...67PwgHp-X2.jpg


Same image but at 100% crop:

http://zig123.smugmug.com/photos/i-8...8NxdbRX-X2.jpg

If you take a good look at the magnified image, you can clearly see a tick on one of the upper petals. BTW, no sharpening or post processing done.

ramcewan Aug 13, 2012 10:09 AM

Hey Zig

Nice shot. I had an old Manual Focus Nikon 300mm AI-S f4.5 for a little while and it was an excellent lens, I only sold it because the Tair 3 is slightly better. That said I kinda miss it as it was actually use-able hand held where as the Tair is really a tripod only lens.

I don't think you can go wrong with a Nikon 300mm prime imho, congrats on the purchase!

zig-123 Aug 14, 2012 4:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ramcewan (Post 1314574)
Hey Zig

I don't think you can go wrong with a Nikon 300mm prime imho, congrats on the purchase!

Hi Andrew,

Yes, you're right, it is hard to beat this older version 300mm prime for clarity and sharpness. While the auto focus is not as fast as the AFS 70-200mm VR, it does a credible job. I went out last night and fooled with it a bit more. A couple of seagull images:


http://zig123.smugmug.com/photos/i-v...vz7Nkzg-X2.jpg

http://zig123.smugmug.com/photos/i-T...Ts7jMmx-X2.jpg

boBBrennan Aug 15, 2012 8:32 AM

Zig, I believe you will have a lot of fun using that lens, these images are a fine beginning.

jacobt Aug 17, 2012 5:10 PM

Hi Zig,

Those are great shots with the 300F4. You got yourself a very good deal from KEH. I was using the the 70-200VRII + TC-14II to achieve the 300mm reach these days. I was wondering if there's any IQ difference between the two?

zig-123 Aug 18, 2012 7:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by boBBrennan (Post 1314805)
Zig, I believe you will have a lot of fun using that lens, these images are a fine beginning.

Thanks Bob.

It is just an old style war horse of a lens. All metal, built like a brick-you know what.

It is an extremely sharp lens and I'm happy to have it.

zig-123 Aug 18, 2012 7:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jacobt (Post 1315124)
Hi Zig,

Those are great shots with the 300F4. You got yourself a very good deal from KEH. I was using the the 70-200VRII + TC-14II to achieve the 300mm reach these days. I was wondering if there's any IQ difference between the two?

I've got the older 70-200mm f2.8 VR version and use it with the TC-14E. I can't notice much, if any, image quality difference.

The reason I bought it was to add a 2x converter and thus have a poor man's 600mm lens. I found out AFTER I bought the lens that it is only compatible with a manual TC-200 teleconverter. Effectively turning this into a manual focus lens. Not the world's biggest issue. But one that I didn't expect.

I've got to try taking some more images with that combo and post a few


Zig

Wingman Aug 20, 2012 11:42 AM

Sharpness and IQ look really good Zig. Looks like you have already mastered the lens!

Jehan

NHL Aug 25, 2012 8:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by zig-123 (Post 1315162)
The reason I bought it was to add a 2x converter and thus have a poor man's 600mm lens. I found out AFTER I bought the lens that it is only compatible with a manual TC-200 teleconverter. Effectively turning this into a manual focus lens. Not the world's biggest issue. But one that I didn't expect.

Zig

That's why they have the 1.7xTC, the combo is still below f/8 so the autofocus might still work depending on the camera ;)

zig-123 Aug 31, 2012 12:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NHL (Post 1316028)
Zig

That's why they have the 1.7xTC, the combo is still below f/8 so the autofocus might still work depending on the camera ;)

Unfortunately, the AF 300mm f4 is the older version which is not compatible with any of the TC series teleconverters that Nikon manufactures. To utilize the TC-17 telecon, it would have to be the AF-s version or later.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:31 AM.