Steve's Digicams Forums

Steve's Digicams Forums (https://forums.steves-digicams.com/)
-   Nikon Lenses (https://forums.steves-digicams.com/nikon-lenses-62/)
-   -   Nikon 70-200 f/2.8 VRII or? (https://forums.steves-digicams.com/nikon-lenses-62/nikon-70-200-f-2-8-vrii-185475/)

LGWGM Mar 16, 2011 4:08 PM

Nikon 70-200 f/2.8 VRII or?
 
Hi guys, I'm looking at the Nikon 70-200mm f/2.8 VRII for my next purchase and would like to get some opinions from the pros here before pulling the trigger.
What are your opinions guys, which is better for this specific focal range Nikon 70-200mm f/2.8 VRII, Tamron, Sigma 70-200mm f/2.8 EX DG OS HSM or Tamron 70-200mm f/2.8 (not sure if there's a stabilized version though)?


Any suggestion is greatly appreciated.

EDIT:
I also found the wide spread issue on the Nikon 70-200mm f/2.8, do the newer ones still suffer this problem?

here's a photo
http://i847.photobucket.com/albums/a...0-200mmf28.jpg

jack55 Mar 17, 2011 11:00 AM

I'm watching this. Curious also.
Also considering the Nikkor 80-400mm f/4.5-5.6D VR

zombz Mar 17, 2011 11:17 AM

most of the reviews ive been seeing is the nikon vr2 70-200 is a great lens if u have the cash laying around but ive also read some good reviews of the sigma 70-200 2.8hsm2 which im picking up in a couple weeks for my d3000

LGWGM Mar 17, 2011 11:33 AM

zombz,

Mind to share some thoughts why you chose the Sigma 70-200mm f/2.8 hsm2 over the Tamron SP AF 70-200mm f/2.8 DI LD IF Macro?

Thanks

zombz Mar 17, 2011 11:40 AM

i just had seen more reviews of the sigma and got a good deal on it

zombz Mar 17, 2011 12:27 PM

this guy is really cool and seems fun and did a review on the sigma 70-200 2.8 here is the link
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bdYWI...eature=fvwkrel

LGWGM Mar 20, 2011 8:22 PM

Yea its fun watching and worth viewing too.

Thanks :)

zombz Mar 20, 2011 9:12 PM

no problem he is very helpful i think and he is fun to watch

JohnG Mar 21, 2011 6:55 AM

As with most lens decisions, it isn't clear cut.
The VR II is the best available for Nikon but you pay for that.
The tamron is fairly sharp (sharper than the sigma) but it is slow to focus - so not good for sports work.
The sigma non-OS is less sharp than the tamron but faster to focus so better for sports.
I haven't seen any field reports on the Sigma OS version - so it's still a bit of an unknown whether performance is up to the price sigma is charging.

What specific photography do you need the lens for?

jack55 Mar 21, 2011 9:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JohnG (Post 1210867)
As with most lens decisions, it isn't clear cut.
The VR II is the best available for Nikon but you pay for that.
The tamron is fairly sharp (sharper than the sigma) but it is slow to focus - so not good for sports work.
The sigma non-OS is less sharp than the tamron but faster to focus so better for sports.
I haven't seen any field reports on the Sigma OS version - so it's still a bit of an unknown whether performance is up to the price sigma is charging.

What specific photography do you need the lens for?

Nikkor lenses are always considerably better than the after-market lenses such as Tamron or Sigma. Those are for those who don't want to spend the extra dollars for Nikkor. As usual, you get what you pay for. ;)


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 3:17 AM.