Go Back   Steve's Digicams Forums >

LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old Feb 4, 2005, 3:18 AM   #1
Senior Member
shene's Avatar
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 579

Sorry for this editing because an unknown problem caused an incomplete upload.

This is the third installment of my "SLR Lens on DC" series. The first discusses a possible way of converting a Nikon SLR lens for the use of a Coolpix 4500 with the help of a BR-3 reversing ring, a LE-Adapter and a William Optics 25mm eyepiece. This post is available here: http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/re...ssage=12038191 The second installment extends what I learned from the first to macro photography using the Kenko 3-tube set extension tubes and a Nikon AFD 60mm Micro Nikkor. Magnification (or reproduction ratio) values obtained were 0.4X (4500) to 2.7X (with Kenko tubes of 12mm, 20mm and 36mm). This installment is available here:http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1007&message=12073488 This third installment is the telephoto part.

Equipment used included a Nikon AFD 80-200mm F2.8 and the eyepiece setup used in the previous two installments:

With the eyepiece mounted, it is a "long" lens:

Since the longest focal length of the 80-200mm is 200mm and since the eyepiece has a focal length of 25mm, the combo becomes an afocal monoscope of power 200/25 = 8X. If you don't like this setup, you might want to use the 180mm F2.8 because the 180mm is smaller and lighter than the 80-200 and because in most cases we use the 200mm end:

The following is the test scene taken with a Coolpix 4500. The 135mm equivalent focal length is about 150mm. The distance from the shooting location to the subject is perhaps slightly more than a mile.

To test this 8X combo, which has a 135mm equivalent focal length of 1200mm, a series of photos were taken with the 80-200mm set to use f/2.8 and f/8.0. The reason is simple. I wanted to see how good the image quality is if the aperture is stopped down to the nearly optimal aperture of the 80-200. In the following, the first image was taken with f/2.8 and the second with f/8.0:

It is obvious that the f/8.0 version has significant light fall-off; however, it is sharper than the f/2.8 version. This is demonstrated by the following two images are 100% the crops from the f/2.8 (top) and the f/8.0 (bottom) version.

The following are 100% crops of the right portion of each image:

As you can see chromatic aberrations in terms of purple and green fringes are there; but, the f/8.0 looks better. In general, the f/8.0 version is sharper with higher contrast and less chromatic aberration. So, in a sunny day, whenever it is possible, stopped down a little does help make the resulting image better. The drawbacks are (1) light fall-off is significant, and (2) shutter speed on the Coolpix 4500 is slower.

The CrystalVue 8X monoscope is popular among 4500/995/990/950 users. It would be interesting if we can see the differences between a $150+ cheap 8X monoscope and a $1,000+ 8X combo. The following is the result taken by a CrystalVue SharpShooter 8X and the same aperture on a 4500:

Apparently, the CrystalVue's image is of lower sharpness and lower contrast than the 80-200 at f/2.8. The following are the 100% crops of the center and right areas of the CrystalVue 8X image:

It is obvious that the 80-200mm has a much better image definition and higher contrast than the CrystalVue 8x. The CrystalVue 8X has low contrast and higher chromatic aberration. However, it does resolve a the bars and window frames on the building slightly better than those of the 80-200mm.

In summary, if you have a good 200mm lens (e.g., the MF Nikkor 200mm F4 (AI or AIS) and MF Micro Nikkor 200mm F4, 80-200 F2.8, etc) and have a Coolpix 4500 in hand, you can easily convert your SLR lens to a 8X monoscope and give you a 1200mm focal length. The quality is better than the commonly used CrystalVue 8X and hence better than the Kenko 8X. Unfortunately, since the G lenses (e.g., 70-200mm F2.8 VR G) have no aperture ring, you can only shoot wide open. Of course, if you have a 300mm lens, you will have a 12X monoscope, providing a combo 1800mm; however, the image quality may not be satisfactory.

Discussions and comparisons of the CrystalVue 8x can be found here:http://www.cs.mtu.edu/~shene/DigiCam...-8x/6x-8x.html and here: http://www.cs.mtu.edu/~shene/DigiCam/User-Guide/Odd-Stuff/14x-8x-8x-6x/14x-8x-8x-6x.html



Nikon Coolpix 950/990/995/2500/4500/5700 and Panasonic FZ-10 User Guides

shene is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 8:04 PM.