Go Back   Steve's Digicams Forums
  • Digital SLR and Interchangeable Lens Cameras
    • >
  • Nikon Lenses
    • Reload this Page
  • Tamron 18-200 vs. Nikon 17-70
    • Forum Home FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


    Reply
    Page 2 of 2 1 2
     
    		LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
    Old Sep 3, 2006, 3:18 PM   #11
    Member
     
    woyteg's Avatar
     
    Join Date: Oct 2005
    Posts: 60
    Default
    galvestonsteve wrote:
    Quote:
    Not possible for candids w/ this bazooka.
    That's why I got 70-200 2.8 VR. Look at this sample photo:

    It was taken with 200mm at 1/15!!! with active VR.
    Attached Images
     
    woyteg is offline   Reply With Quote
    Old Sep 3, 2006, 10:34 PM   #12
    Member
     
    jmoro's Avatar
     
    Join Date: Jun 2004
    Posts: 32
    Default
    I don't think you'll like it. I bought it, used it for two days (very heavily) and wound up returning it. It was way too soft. Way too soft.I wound up buying a 28-200 Nikon Lens which replaced my broken 28-105 Macro.THis new 28-200 is amazingly sharp above f6.7
    jmoro is offline   Reply With Quote
    Reply
    Page 2 of 2 1 2


    « Previous Thread | Next Thread »
    Thread Tools Search this Thread
    Search this Thread:

    Advanced Search

    Posting Rules
    You may not post new threads
    You may not post replies
    You may not post attachments
    You may not edit your posts
    BB code is On
    Smilies are On
    [IMG] code is On
    HTML code is Off
    Trackbacks are On
    Pingbacks are On
    Refbacks are On


    All times are GMT -5. The time now is 8:26 AM.

    Steve's Digicams - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Top