Go Back   Steve's Digicams Forums >

LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old Jun 22, 2011, 10:50 AM   #11
Senior Member
tizeye's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 382

Originally Posted by howiem View Post
16mm is a pretty good wide end if I want to shoot architecture or landscape and 85mm is a decent portrait length. How does sharpness shape up and is there much barrel distortion at the wide end?
I was considering the 16-85, and it is a great lens far surpassing the 18-55 and 18-105. Ultimately ended up with the Tamron 17-50 f2.8 (non-VR) for totally different reasons, otherwise would have been the 16-85.

How does the 16-85 do on the short end? As I tested it, nothing to complain about unless you are being very critical. Yes, 16 does introduce more distortion, but that is almost normal for any zoom lens as they trail off at both ends. Given a choice, the Sigma 10-20 @ 16 may be the the one to select for the photo, but, if unable to change lens, the 16-85 @ 16 is perfectly acceptable.
tizeye is offline   Reply With Quote

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 5:39 PM.