Go Back   Steve's Digicams Forums > Digital SLR and Interchangeable Lens Cameras > Nikon Lenses

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old Feb 5, 2008, 3:06 AM   #1
Senior Member
 
guillermovilas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Hasselt , Belgium
Posts: 794
Default

Well there are no posts dedicated to TOKINA or TAMRON lenses , strange because
lots of people would like to know how they compare to the big makes :?:G:?.


I`m dedicating a part of my personal webalbum site to showing a few pictures taken with different lenses.

Here you will find pictures taken with a Sigma 30mm f/1.4 & a Tokina 100mm f/2.8 macro , these 2 lenses are not that popular , most people favor Nikon 35mm f/2 or 50mm f/1.4 over the Sigma and the Tamron 90mm f/2.8 macro , Sigma 100mm f/2.8 macro , Nikon 60mm f/2.8 macro , Nikon 105mm f/2.8 VR macro over the Tokina.

So have a look at how these perform and do come back later because i`ll be posting some more pictures taken with other lenses like the Tokina 12-24mm f/4 & Tamron f/2.8 macro and many more in the futur

http://philippeluyckx.zenfolio.com/f1046805206/






guillermovilas is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old Feb 5, 2008, 5:22 PM   #2
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 147
Default

Tamron, for some reason, has always been better than i expected i had the cheapo 70-300 and it was just warm and had a nice look to it (not that sharp or contrasty, but still darn pleasant and great color).
Can't say that about the sigmas i used, they all sucked.
chris89 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Feb 5, 2008, 5:37 PM   #3
NHL
Senior Member
 
NHL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: 39.18776, -77.311353333333
Posts: 11,547
Default

guillermovilas had an excellent idea
... and I can't help but do the same for theses two Sigmas:
http://www.pbase.com/nhl/sigma_50_500
http://www.pbase.com/nhl/sigma_150_macro

-> I'll follow with my Tokina 16-50 f/2.8 shortly...
NHL is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Feb 5, 2008, 8:22 PM   #4
Senior Member
 
rjseeney's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Taylor Mill, Kentucky
Posts: 2,398
Default

I've used some cheapo tamrons with some success. I just wasn't thrilled with build quality. I also owned a tamron 200-400 and although I liked it, it was just too big and I didn't use it all that much.

I just got the sigma 10-20 and the build quality is very good, and although I've only taken a few shots with it, I really think I'm going to like it. I had a few sigmas with my old Minolta film setup too.
rjseeney is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Feb 5, 2008, 9:05 PM   #5
NHL
Senior Member
 
NHL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: 39.18776, -77.311353333333
Posts: 11,547
Default

People tend to lump all 3rd party lenses into one mixed bag, but actually like Nikon (or Canon), the 3rd party lenses are also divided into two low/high-end groups with various quality levels:

o The consumer grade lenses
-> Usually plastic build and more affordable which tend to have questionable quality as they compete on prices for the mass market

o The pro-level grade lenses
-> Most if not all the lenses in this group tend to be made out of metal and are of higher quality than consumer grade polycarbonate's Nikon. The lenses in this group are the Tamron SP (High-Performance Specification), the Tokina ATX-Pro, and the Sigma EX which also come in HSM (AF-s equivalent):

http://www.tamron.com/lenses/prod/as...lim_Jim_07.pdf
http://www.tokinalens.com/products/tokina/index.html
http://sigmaphoto.com/lenses/lenses.asp
NHL is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Feb 7, 2008, 4:32 AM   #6
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 195
Default

The only Sigma lens I have is a 70-200mm HSM f2.8 that I bought about 8 or9 months ago. It gives fantastic pictures and even when I put a 1.4 teleconverter on it (does that make 2 Sigma lenses?), it didn't seem to lose any quality... The only reason I don't use this lens too much is because of my blood pressure shakes, which spoil those long shots. I do use it from a tripod though. Apart from that I use VR lenses. Helps meimmensely... Once Sigma reveal theirimage stablisingtechnology, I'll be in like a robbers dog...
fewpics is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Feb 27, 2008, 9:59 PM   #7
Senior Member
 
joeybob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Pittsburgh, Pa.
Posts: 148
Default

I own 2 Sigma lenses. An old 24mm f/2.8 prime and the AF 10-20mm f/4-5.6 EX DC HSM.

I purchased the 24mm 2nd hand and I suspect it needs a little service as it only opens to a max aperature of 3.0 not 2.8. It's not exactly the sharpest lens but it does okay. When it focus' it is loud. I read somewhere that this was a common complaint about that lens.

The 10-20 is really nice and it's really W-I-D-E. I recently got this lens and have not had much time to experiment with it. I've read complaints about this lens' sharpness and from what I've noticed I wonder if that could be related to the relatively limited aperature that this lens has. I can't say that the lens is exceptionally sharp but instead it requires a good deal of light to pull off an image with a good contrast. My intent is to use this lens for landscapes and architecture and I've noted that a dimly lit room is not the best setting for using this lens. Here is one shot I took the day I received this lens:
Attached Images
 
joeybob is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Feb 28, 2008, 6:02 AM   #8
Moderator
 
Nagasaki's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 897
Default

I own several third party lenses and have found the quality to be great. There are cheap rubbish lenses made by all manufacturers including Nikon.

I have had a Sigma 50mm Macro for several years, originally used it with film. I'm still happy with the results I'm getting with digital.

This shot was taken a couple of weeks ago on a D80.


Attached Images
 
Nagasaki is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Feb 28, 2008, 6:06 AM   #9
Moderator
 
Nagasaki's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 897
Default

The Tokina 10-17 fisheye lens is a brilliant lens. I think the quality rivals the Nikon 10.5 fisheye with the flexibility of a zoom that gives a field of view between 180 and 100 degrees.

This shot taken at 14mm with a D70 last October.


Attached Images
 
Nagasaki is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Feb 28, 2008, 6:10 AM   #10
Moderator
 
Nagasaki's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 897
Default

My most recent third party lens is a Tamron 90mm macro. I considered the Nikon 105 but reviews said this was as good if not better in some circumstances and Ipreferred the slightly shorter focal length.

Shot on a D80 early this month.


Attached Images
 
Nagasaki is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:32 PM.