Go Back   Steve's Digicams Forums > Digital SLR and Interchangeable Lens Cameras > Nikon Lenses

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old Dec 7, 2010, 6:01 PM   #1
Senior Member
 
banksy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Western Australia
Posts: 2,144
Default Neutral Density Filter for D90

Hi everyone,

Can anyone please explain the difference between ND4 and ND8 in these filters? Thanks
banksy is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old Dec 7, 2010, 6:48 PM   #2
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,093
Default

ND4 provides 2 full f-stops worth of light reduction (one quarter the unfiltered light); ND8 provides 3 full f-stops worth of light reduction (one eighth the unfiltered light).
tclune is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Dec 7, 2010, 6:52 PM   #3
Senior Member
 
banksy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Western Australia
Posts: 2,144
Default

Thanks for the post.
I am a newbie at this - would D4 be used when you need a little more light and D8 when you need more light (eg dusk or early morning)?
We want to photograph waterfalls and ocean surf. Cheers
banksy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Dec 7, 2010, 7:23 PM   #4
Senior Member
 
TCav's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Washington, DC, Metro Area, Maryland
Posts: 13,543
Default

Can you not get the shots you want now?

Can you post some samples of what you are getting?
__________________
  • The lens is the thing.
  • 'Full Frame' is the new 'Medium Format'.
  • "One good test is worth a thousand expert opinions." - Tex Johnston, Boeing 707 test pilot.
TCav is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Dec 7, 2010, 7:23 PM   #5
Senior Member
 
frank-in-toronto's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Toronto Canada
Posts: 1,083
Default

I can see how you can get confused. The first link that shows up using google is
http://www.cs.mtu.edu/~shene/DigiCam...filter-ND.html
and, oh boy, do they make it difficult. perhaps the to and fro here will make it clearer for you.

tclune said it exactly. then your reply showed up. you appear to have things backwards. lemmee try.

waterfalls. you're looking for a slow shutter speed to give that blurred effect. so perhaps 1/15 second. on a bright day at iso100 you'll be somewhere near 1/125 at f16. you'll need to slow down the shutter. if you can stop down further, that'll help. say 1/50 at f22. still too fast. add an ND4. That's 2 stops. so 1/10 or so at f22. might be ok. an ND8 instead would allow you to use 1/5 at f22.

see? the additional ND filter in front of the lens allows you to keep the shutter open longer and still obtain correct exposure.

if you haven't got the nd filters yet, you might like to investigate the cokin system. i got that as it allows me to have up to 3 filters in front of the lens. i like fewer restrictions and i really don't like screwing filters on and off. they get stuck or my finger will smudge one.

the shutter speed to use actually is open to debate and experiment. some suggest 2 seconds even. it'll depend on the effect you're looking for, speed of the water etc. while you're set up on your tripod using mirror lock up or remote release or self timer, take varying exposures. review later and see how things look.

hmmmmmmm. i don't know if what i typed helps. what do you think?
frank-in-toronto is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Dec 7, 2010, 7:27 PM   #6
Senior Member
 
banksy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Western Australia
Posts: 2,144
Default

Thanks TCav. I will trawl through our photos and attempt to upload a couple.
banksy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Dec 7, 2010, 7:28 PM   #7
Senior Member
 
banksy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Western Australia
Posts: 2,144
Default

Thanks frank-in-Toronto, we will look into this.
banksy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Dec 7, 2010, 8:03 PM   #8
Senior Member
 
banksy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Western Australia
Posts: 2,144
Default

TCav here are a couple of photos I thought might be better with a filter??
Attached Images
  
banksy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Dec 7, 2010, 8:15 PM   #9
Senior Member
 
rjseeney's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Taylor Mill, Kentucky
Posts: 2,398
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by banksy View Post
TCav here are a couple of photos I thought might be better with a filter??

ND filters will allow you to use longer shutter speeds by reducing the amount of light entering the lens to give moving water the silky look. This is especially helpful on bright days. Another advantage is they also allow you to use larger apertures on bright days to give a smaller DOF to isolate your subject from the background (the blurred background effect). So to address your earlier question, you'd use ND filters when you want to reduce the amount of light, not when you need a little more light.

One caveat...when using more aggressive nd filters you will likely need to use a tripod
rjseeney is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Dec 7, 2010, 11:12 PM   #10
Senior Member
 
banksy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Western Australia
Posts: 2,144
Default

Wonderful information.
Thank you to everybody for their posts - this is a great forum!
banksy is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:23 AM.