Go Back   Steve's Digicams Forums > Digital SLR and Interchangeable Lens Cameras > Nikon Lenses

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old Aug 18, 2011, 9:26 PM   #1
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 688
Default 105vr macro

Looking to get into macro photography
Is the Nikon 105 vr a good starter
Can it also be used as a portrait lens
Currently using a d300s

Dave
Nikontrini
dafiryde is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old Aug 19, 2011, 7:21 AM   #2
Senior Member
 
TCav's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Washington, DC, Metro Area, Maryland
Posts: 13,572
Default

First, there are no bad macro lenses, so it's hard to go wrong.

Second, the Nikon 105/2.8 VR Macro lens is stabilized, so it's good for handheld shooting, not necessarily for 1:1 macro, but certainly for 1:2 or 1:3 macro.

Third, the important thing about picking a macro lens is getting a focal length that's appropriate for your subject. If you'll be shooting animate subjects (insects and small animals), you'll wnat a longer focal length with a narrower angle of view so you can be farther away (for the same magnification) and not frighten away the subject or block your own light. If you'll be shooting inanimate subjects in good light, you might want a macro lens with a shorter focal length, so you can more easily adjust the subject and the lights.

Fourth, 105mm is a little long for a portraiture. For 35mm film portraiture, the best focal lengths are from 85mm to 135mm. With an APS-C size image sensor, that's 57mm to 90mm.
__________________
  • The lens is the thing.
  • 'Full Frame' is the new 'Medium Format'.
  • "One good test is worth a thousand expert opinions." - Tex Johnston, Boeing 707 test pilot.
TCav is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Aug 19, 2011, 2:40 PM   #3
Senior Member
 
Wizzard0003's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Aberdeen, WA USA
Posts: 1,085
Default

Don't know if you'd be intersted in this lens but I just recieved delivery of it yesterday...

Nikon Nikkor AF-S DX Micro 85 mm f/3.5G ED VR
http://www.lenstip.com/index.html?te...wu&test_ob=285

The difference in min focus difference between this and the 105VR is very little...

105VR = .314 meters (12.36 inches)
85G = .286 meters (11.26 inches)
Difference = .028 meters (1.10 inches) more for the 105VR

Note: Those distances are from the focal plain (the surface of the sensor) not
from the end of the lens... From the end of the lens it's about 5 (ish) inches
with the 85G...

Equivelent focal length for the 85G on an APS-C sensor is 127.5mm...

Here's one of my first images with this lens of a mosquito taken last night out back by
the trash dumpster where I work...

This image is cropped, hand-held with on-camera flash using AF-C, spot metering and VR...

D7k / 85mm / f/16 / 1/320 / ISO 100

http://forums.dpreview.com/galleries...wnload/1342092

Click on the link below the image (and then click on the image in the browser) for
full size...

The AF is super fast but will search sometimes... I believe that's typical for many
macro lenses though...

Hope that helps somehow...
__________________
William

D7k with old/new glass and a few other things...

Last edited by Wizzard0003; Aug 19, 2011 at 2:50 PM.
Wizzard0003 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Aug 19, 2011, 2:55 PM   #4
Senior Member
 
TCav's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Washington, DC, Metro Area, Maryland
Posts: 13,572
Default

The Nikon 85/3.5 is also a very good, stabilized, macro lens, but I think f/3.5 is a little small for portraiture.
__________________
  • The lens is the thing.
  • 'Full Frame' is the new 'Medium Format'.
  • "One good test is worth a thousand expert opinions." - Tex Johnston, Boeing 707 test pilot.
TCav is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Aug 19, 2011, 2:59 PM   #5
Senior Member
 
Wizzard0003's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Aberdeen, WA USA
Posts: 1,085
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TCav View Post
The Nikon 85/3.5 is also a very good, stabilized, macro lens, but I think f/3.5 is a little small for portraiture.
I'd tend to agree for the most part, but do-able... Fine for Macro though as you usually end
up stopping way down to get DOF anyway...
__________________
William

D7k with old/new glass and a few other things...
Wizzard0003 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Aug 19, 2011, 11:23 PM   #6
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 688
Default

thanks for the assistance so far
came accross this Sigma 70mm f/2.8 EX DG Macro
got a good review from slr gear and photozone
is there such a thing as a good macro and portrait lens in one
is this a good candidate
really want to get into macro photography and will most likely be doing insects and flowers
to be honest i am not a portrait photographer type

Dave
Nikontrini
dafiryde is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Aug 20, 2011, 3:51 AM   #7
Senior Member
 
Wizzard0003's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Aberdeen, WA USA
Posts: 1,085
Default

In my opinion just about any macro will do a decent job of portrait photography, it's just
that a "Portrait" lens will tend to have a larger minimum aperture which will help in getting
better subject isolation... In macro work many tend to go for smaller apertures to overcome
the severely reduced DOF caused by being so close to the subject so larger apertures aren't
needed so much... Not worrying about having a large minimum aperture on a macro helps
manufacturers to keep the cost down as well...

If you're not a serious partrait photographer (as I am not) than a macro should be able to
handle most of the portrait shooting you'll probably do...

JMHO of course, YMMV...
__________________
William

D7k with old/new glass and a few other things...

Last edited by Wizzard0003; Aug 20, 2011 at 3:55 AM.
Wizzard0003 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Aug 20, 2011, 6:12 AM   #8
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 688
Default

please excuse me for my stupidity, but i just cant figure out why i included the word portrait in this topic.
so to start it off again
i am interested in getting into macro photography and interested in shooting insects and flowers, i dont own a tripod so will be doing handheld .
which lens would you recomend

Dave
Nikontrini

Last edited by dafiryde; Aug 20, 2011 at 6:15 AM.
dafiryde is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Aug 20, 2011, 7:31 AM   #9
Senior Member
 
TCav's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Washington, DC, Metro Area, Maryland
Posts: 13,572
Default

The Sigma 70/2.8 is probably one of the best lenses ever made.

If you want to find out for certain if a lens is siutable for what you want to do, you could always rent it.
__________________
  • The lens is the thing.
  • 'Full Frame' is the new 'Medium Format'.
  • "One good test is worth a thousand expert opinions." - Tex Johnston, Boeing 707 test pilot.
TCav is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Aug 20, 2011, 8:07 PM   #10
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 688
Default

i live in the caribbean so renting or even trying out is not an option, i have to buy , try and hope that is what i was looking for.

Dave
Nikontrini
dafiryde is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 4:01 PM.