Go Back   Steve's Digicams Forums > Digital SLR and Interchangeable Lens Cameras > Nikon Lenses

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old May 9, 2005, 9:12 AM   #1
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 4
Default

Iam going tobuy a D70s and don't like kit len. I plan to buy either of them

1. AF-S 24-120 VR

2. AF 24-85 F2.8_4



Does anyone have any experience on them ? Could you post me your commentson which one is better ? Is there any problem for using them on D70s ? Thanks for your valuable input in advance.
jylai is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old May 9, 2005, 5:58 PM   #2
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 5
Default

jylai
like you i too did away with the std lens kit and opted after some pondering on the 24-120VR. I use it with the earlier D70 and have had only the greatest fun. I don't shoot on too high ISO for obvious reasons and since Im not planning to enlarge my results, it doesnt matter. 24-120VR is a great all round lens to carry about esp if you are not planning on having a few other lenses. Gives you wide angle to medium telephoto range and with the 1.5x ratio is really sufficient for a lot of amateur photographers' needs. Have had no specific complaints really - sometime focusing can be a tad slow in difficult circumstances. Definitely recommend using the lens hood when shooting towards light source. I have had better lens hood, too easy to come off when knocked (are you listening mr nikon).

I have since added the 70-200VR to my range and find the 2 more than adequate for my use. Maybe missing the ultra wide angle like a 12-24mm have to rob the bank first before I go there.

Go for the 24-120VR - you'll love it - not the fastest lens but then I would have had to pay more if they had made aperture constant at f2.8 all the way.
Davy28 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 9, 2005, 10:02 PM   #3
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 4
Default

Hi Davy,

Thanks for your comment. Actually I prefer to buy 24-120 since the most frequent use focal length is covered. But I also notice the 24-85 having F2.8, that means this lens probaby possess higher optical performance than 24-120. So this is dilemma for me to choose either of them.

Does somebody has experience on 24-120 & 24-85 (F2.8) ? I really need your valuable recommendation from them ...........looking forward to hearing any good or bad to them.
jylai is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 11, 2005, 12:42 AM   #4
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 25
Default

i hear the 24-85/3.5-4.5 AFS actually might be better than the 24-85/2.8-4 ? only other alternates are 3rd party lenses (tamron 28-75/Di, Sigma 24-70 or 24-60, etc..).

a pop photo review claimed the sigma 24-60 is a reall good lens.
navin advani is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 11, 2005, 8:51 AM   #5
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 5
Default

jylai

your comments on f2.8 noted regarding the 24-85 lens. i agree that aperture of 2.8 gives you a little more flexibility especially in poor light condition but certainly no reflection (pardon the pun) on the quality of the lens.

i cannot say anything about the 24-85 lens as i have not used it myself. what i can say though is that i love the flexibility the VR gives me when using the 24-120 lens - even in unfriendly light condition.

check this out if you haven't already seen it

http://www.kenrockwell.com/nikon/2485afs.htm

good luck. frankly you cannot go wrong with either lens i say. click away my friend.
Davy28 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 11, 2005, 10:14 AM   #6
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 4
Default

Hi Davy,

I got ! I have seen this commnet frombefore and am also aware24-120 VR isnot as good from kenrockwell.......I went to your profile window seeing you have two girls, me too. I will buy a lens for go-around use. Maybe my pondering is wrong that 24-85 F2.8 will be optically better. I hear this point from few local sellers. I am still trying to have more discussions betwen them. I am new to DSLR but I know camer bodies come and go but lens can be used for ten or above.....that's why I am seriously thinking about them. Anyway, your kind advice is appreciated. I will letyou know my decision and hope cansharemy enjoying on 24-120 VR in the near future.


jylai is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 11, 2005, 10:22 AM   #7
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 4
Default

Davy,

Some comments from DPreview



http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/re...ssage=13430450
jylai is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 18, 2005, 10:50 PM   #8
Senior Member
 
Ronnie948's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 721
Default

The 24/120VR is all I ever use anymore. I do weddings, pets, portraits and all of My travel senics with it. I have never had A single complaint from A client about the quality of their photographs.

I just got back from two weeks in IceLand with 1,626 pictures and they are all just great. I have already printed some 13" X 19" photographs with no problems at all. As I have said on this forum many times." The 24/120 "VR" nikon lens is the best one only lens for me.

This picture is shot through A dirty van window wile moving and It still printed excellent enough to sell at 12" X 18".
Attached Images
 
Ronnie948 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 19, 2005, 2:12 AM   #9
Senior Member
 
cameranserai's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 548
Default

The 24/120 was my standard lens for 10 years on my film camera, but it just doesn't cut the cake for me any more I'm afraid. 36/180 isn't what I want, it is 24/120 and Nikon don't have a lens to fit any more. Sad. I use the 17/55 F2.8 for weddings but miss the extra focal length, but I can't, in tight situations, be doing with a lens that only gives me 36mm at the widest angle. Yes I've tried the 24/120 on my D2X but frankly the kit lens (18/70) off the old D70 is the preferred travelling lens now. I only wish, and I've said it so many times, that Nikon would bring out a 16/80 to replace the 24/120 in digital terms. That would be the perfect travelling lens. As it is I now am forced to carry my bag in the car with two lenses, the 18/70 and the 70/200 VRIFED. I often wonder why Nikon didn't make the 18/70 to fit the TC series of converters too. Having had my little rant there does seem to be one lens out there which does fit the bill though - the Sigma 18/125 which is a new lens especially designed for digital cameras. Looking on Ebay this seems to be in the region of £170 or $325 so it isn't expensive and should be the perfect travelling lens. I'm going to have a good look at it myself and possibly buy. Just my thought on the matter.
cameranserai is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Aug 10, 2005, 8:25 AM   #10
Senior Member
 
Ronnie948's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 721
Default

I just did another succesful wedding with My D100 and 20/120 VR and I just have a hard time believing I can do just about anything with this equipment and Photoshop CS2.
Attached Images
 
Ronnie948 is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:42 PM.