Go Back   Steve's Digicams Forums > Digital SLR and Interchangeable Lens Cameras > Nikon Lenses

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old Feb 24, 2006, 1:36 AM   #1
Member
 
billybobbovine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 90
Default

Hi, I am looking to buy a nikon d50 and for sure I am going to buy the 18-70mm AF-s. What I cannot decide on is what tele lense to buy. It would be great to get a 70-210, but those are quite hard to get ahold of and are more expensive. So I have been looking at the 55-200 versus the 70-300. Both are inexpensive and not really suited for high speed photography, but I am not looking to do that. From personal experience, what do people feel is a better lens over all? Thanks for your help
billybobbovine is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old Feb 24, 2006, 6:34 AM   #2
Senior Member
 
rjseeney's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Taylor Mill, Kentucky
Posts: 2,398
Default

Unless you need the extra reach, I would opt for the 55-200. It's faster focusing, smaller and handles a little better. The 70-300 is soft over 200mm, and the difference between 200mm and 300mm is not really all that much.
rjseeney is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Feb 24, 2006, 10:27 AM   #3
Member
 
billybobbovine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 90
Default

Thanks. Thats what I was leaning towards. I had heardthe 70-300 was quite soft over 200 too.
billybobbovine is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Feb 25, 2006, 2:30 AM   #4
Senior Member
 
cameranserai's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 548
Default

If you don't mind going second hand, then take a look at the older but all metal 75/300 f4.5/5.6. I have had it for years and recently resurrected it for travelling since it is so light. It had very good revues and I have found it sharp across the range. A good one will set you back about $150.
cameranserai is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Feb 25, 2006, 1:36 PM   #5
Member
 
billybobbovine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 90
Default

really. thyast about as much as a new 70/300, so thats not bad at all. i gotta check at the used stores around me for a good deal.
billybobbovine is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Feb 25, 2006, 1:36 PM   #6
Member
 
billybobbovine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 90
Default

really. thyast about as much as a new 70/300, so thats not bad at all. i gotta check at the used stores around me for a good deal.
billybobbovine is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:23 AM.