Go Back   Steve's Digicams Forums > Digital SLR and Interchangeable Lens Cameras > Nikon Lenses

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old Feb 27, 2006, 7:29 AM   #1
Senior Member
 
DorkUnderwater's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 158
Default

I see these lenses on ebay going for 200+ and have good ratings, i dont understand however why it is so much more than the 18-55, which doesnt seem to be that much of a sacrifice.
DorkUnderwater is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old Feb 27, 2006, 9:42 AM   #2
Senior Member
 
audioedge's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 254
Default

yep and according to rockwell (ok hes biased but these are both nikkors), the 18-55 is better....

weird huh
audioedge is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Feb 27, 2006, 11:56 AM   #3
rey
Senior Member
 
rey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 949
Default

If you already have the 18-55, it's not worth getting it. If you're planning on getting the D50, I'd get the D50 with its 18-55 kit lens.

But if you're planning on getting the D70s, I'd get the D70s with this 18-70 mm kit lens, it's usually an additional $190 more than the D70s body. If you don't like it, you can easily sell it for $200+ use that to buy the 18-55, and keep the difference.

I regularly read Rockwell's site, but you also have to understand that he does more landscape than anything else, and he admits he rarely use both the 18-55 or the 18-70. I agree with him, and I wouldn't buy the 18-70mm by itself, instead I'd go with the 18-55 and the 70-300mm for the same price.

rey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Feb 27, 2006, 5:43 PM   #4
Senior Member
 
rjseeney's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Taylor Mill, Kentucky
Posts: 2,398
Default

The build quality and optics are also slightly better with the 18-70. Most people do find the limited tele length a little short, so if you were only buying one lens with the d50, the 18-70 would be a better choice. However for the same price you could get both the 18-55 and the 55-200 two lens kit.
rjseeney is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Feb 27, 2006, 6:07 PM   #5
Senior Member
 
audioedge's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 254
Default

rjseeney on what evidence are you basing the fact the build and optics are better on the 18-70? at least rockwell clearly documents why he feels the 18-55 is better
audioedge is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Feb 28, 2006, 9:31 PM   #6
Senior Member
 
DorkUnderwater's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 158
Default

ive been watching a few ebay auctions, the 18-55 55-200 kit lens is actually CHEAPER than the 18-70, by up to a 100, and these are the good sellers (after looking at their feedback and theirs sites on resellers). yeah i think its just hype if its that bad, as much as id prefer one lens , i should get two, and there prolly will be a place where i wish i had more tele!
DorkUnderwater is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 6, 2006, 6:02 PM   #7
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 2
Default

Mr. Underwater, I went thru the 18-55 or 18-70 dilemna, finally choosing a used 18-70. The biggest dilemna for me is being able to settle in my mind on the quality versus dollars choice in lenses. Is the difference worth it? Build quality? True AF-S? Slightly wider aperture? Sharper? Less distortion? Manual focus without flipping a switch? Maybe. Maybe not. Can you tell, or better can I tell the difference in the final output? Probably not. But I do have piece of mind and that is well worth the extra $$$ difference to me.
hyndsyght is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 6, 2006, 6:25 PM   #8
Senior Member
 
rjseeney's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Taylor Mill, Kentucky
Posts: 2,398
Default

audioedge wrote:
Quote:
rjseeney on what evidence are you basing the fact the build and optics are better on the 18-70? at least rockwell clearly documents why he feels the 18-55 is better
Rockwell is not the end all source for Nikon info:-). He is an interesting read, but he's a bit over the top for me. For example, he provides reviews for lenses that he doesn't own or use. Most reputable sources favor the 18-70 both optically and in build quality, especially at extremes. However, the average user would be hard pressed to tell the difference at normal print size. I do own both lenses so i do feel qualified to discuss the differences between the 2:G, and the 18-55 is a bit too light and more plasticky feeling than the 18-70. I rarely use the 18-55, mainly because the I find the range a bit limiting.

I don't dislike the lens, and have recommended it many times. If you're buying the D50, i see no reason not to get it. For the same price of the 18-70 bought seperately, you could get the two lens kit, the 18-55 and the 55-200. I see no reason to choose the 18-70 over the 2 lens kit.
rjseeney is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 6, 2006, 6:29 PM   #9
Senior Member
 
goomer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Kamloops, B.C.
Posts: 378
Default

I personally sold my 18-55 in favour of getting the 18-70 for the Internal focussing that the 18-70 provides. The front element on the 18-55 rotates while focussing and it was a bit of a pain when using polarizer, ND grad filters.
goomer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 19, 2006, 10:04 AM   #10
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 6
Default

As a prospective D50 buyer, I'm weighing up 18-55 vs 18-70. Never used either but have the following comments following various sample images & reviews other than the obvioius coverage/aperture/build/weight/price:

18-55 benefits:
Appears to have less distortion at wide end and less vignetting.
Takes smaller / more affordable filters.
Focuses closer.
18-70 benefits:
Appears to have less chromatic aberration.
Non-rotating front for filters
Has a proper manual focus ring.
Indication of focus distance.

Cost (£100 more for 18-70 as part of kit) is real issue to me but it's this last that has me stumped. Could I put up with a lens where it's impossible to set the hyperfocal distance for big DOF. But then, maybe I can put up with the 18-55 until I can afford a lens that's better than either and getting rid of it won't have lost me so many £s. But then again, the 18-70 is a more verasatile one-lens solution (I'm definitely not interested in the 2-lens kit). As you can see, I'm still wavering.

PS I was a bit confused by Ken Rockwell's review - it didn't really say why he thought the 18-55 was better. Any help would be appreciated re my reaching a decison.

David
McBarset is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 5:40 AM.