Go Back   Steve's Digicams Forums > Digital SLR and Interchangeable Lens Cameras > Nikon Lenses

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old May 6, 2006, 10:23 AM   #11
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 30
Default

In regards to the Sigma 70-300 APO lens, How much worse is the non-APO lens? is the extra $100 or so really noticable? I can't seem to find comparisions.

Thanks.
Kewjoe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 7, 2006, 7:20 PM   #12
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 76
Default

From everything I've read and seen its not worth buying the non-APO lens. So if you are going to get the Sigma 70-300 you should just save up the extra 100.00 for it.
Kewjoe wrote:
Quote:
In regards to the Sigma 70-300 APO lens, How much worse is the non-APO lens? is the extra $100 or so really noticable? I can't seem to find comparisions.

Thanks.
Quikster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 10, 2006, 4:17 AM   #13
Junior Member
 
velveteen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 5
Default

Thanks for everyone you has posted his comments..

I placed my order with the non-APO nikon lens..Hope it worths buying One of my friends got the Sigma 70-300 APO, so I will have a chance to compare and hopefully wont beregretted..

Thanks again..
velveteen is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:42 PM.