Go Back   Steve's Digicams Forums > Digital SLR and Interchangeable Lens Cameras > Nikon Lenses

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old Aug 10, 2006, 10:52 AM   #1
Junior Member
 
thorxgal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 4
Default

Tokina announced prices for coming lenses

16-50/2.8 http://www.tokina.co.jp/news/4961607atx165news.html
Translation Babelfish
http://babelfish.altavista.com/babel...tx165news.html
Desired retail price 113,000 Yen. Approx. $982. Sale due date 2006 late November

50-135/2.8 http://www.tokina.co.jp/news/4961607atx535news.html
Translation Babelfish
http://babelfish.altavista.com/babel...tx535news.html
Desired retail price 138,000 Yen. Approx. $1200, Sale due date 2006 middle of October

10-17/3,5-4,5 http://www.tokina.co.jp/news/4961607atx107news.html
Translation Babelfish
http://babelfish.altavista.com/babel...tx107news.html
Desired retail price 82,000 Yen. Approx. $713. Sale due date 2006 September first third
thorxgal is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old Aug 11, 2006, 12:22 AM   #2
rey
Senior Member
 
rey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 949
Default

Good find.

Interesting ranges... And a Fish-Eye Zoom! That's something you don't see everyday.

I would have rather seen an 18-200 from them though... And maybe a price drop, and increased supply of the 12-24.

rey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Aug 15, 2006, 12:14 PM   #3
Member
 
Stephen Hopkins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 76
Default

Those prices sound extremely high compared to other similar lenses. I doubt many would pay nearly $1000 US for the 16-50mm f/2.8 when they can get the Nikkor 17-55mm f/2.8 for around $1200 after rebate. I would have expected the price of this particular lens to be more in the $500 range, similar to the 12-24mm f/4 and 28-80mm f/2.8 (the lens it is essential a DX equivalent to).

The same holds true for the 50-135mm f/2.8. It seems it would priced more in the $- $600 - $700 range like the 80-200mm f/2.8 was (before being discontinued) since this essentially the DX equivalent.

The 10-17mm f/3.5-4.5 fisheye has a bit less precadent but seeing as this lens was joint-developed by Tokina & Pentax it seems the price would be closer to or less than to $580, the MSRP of the pentax version.

This may be a case of the japanese prices simply being higher than the US prices... similar holds for Nikon products in the UK with prices being roughly $1 to 1 GBP while the true exchange rate is $1 = $1.89 GBP.
Stephen Hopkins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Aug 27, 2006, 9:06 PM   #4
Senior Member
 
zygh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 531
Default

I agree, the prices are too high, especially for the 16-50mm. I would fancy that lens but I would never pay anything more than 500$ for it. For that price I'd get the 17-50mm Tamron and be happy with it.
zygh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Aug 29, 2006, 11:23 PM   #5
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 13
Default

Suggested list prices are usually 30-40% higher than what they go for at a reputable online dealer. The sigma 18-50 is $720 on the manufacturers website and sells for $409 on b&hphoto. The tamron 17-50 2.8 is $763 on their website but sells for $449. I think the 16-50 will be marketed to compete directly with tamron and sigma's versions. I'm betting around $549. The 10-17 and 50-135 also lower proportionately.
Just my opinion.
matsumoto is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Aug 30, 2006, 5:33 AM   #6
Senior Member
 
BenjaminXYZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 788
Default

Very expensive!

Expecially I was looking forward to the F/2.8 16-50 mm too.

Now I don't need to get botheredbecause I still havethe Tamron F/2.8 17-50 mm.

SIGMA also have the F/2.8 50 - 150 mm if I am not mistaken. I don't believe it will cost that much as the Tokina 50-135/2.8 version.

http://www.slrgear.com/reviews/showp...ate/1130796423

http://www.slrgear.com/reviews/showp...ate/1130876055


BenjaminXYZ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Aug 30, 2006, 5:47 AM   #7
Senior Member
 
zygh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 531
Default

Yeah, that 50-150mm Sigma is looking mighty good, especially for the right price.

I think that Tokina needs to improve its sales figures against the likes ofSigma/Tamron so my guess is that it will lower its prices just a slight to make their lens offer more competitive. At least, that's what I hope 'cuz that 16-50mm sounds delicious :-).




zygh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Feb 9, 2007, 2:05 AM   #8
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 10
Default

The Tokina 16-50 f/2.8 will be worth $1000 to me under 2 conditions: 1) they come close to matching the quality of the Nikon 17-55 f/2.8, AND 2) the wide end is a true 16mm (or even a bit wider). The Nikon disappoints because it is really more an 18-55 than 17-55 with the result that it is a 27mm equivalent at the wide end.

Considering that Nikon's most popular full framelenses are their 24-xxx line, it is strange that they have missed the boat with their APS lenses. 27-28mm equivalent is just not wide enough for landscape and general scenic photography.

I'd rather have excellent 16 f/2.8 & 35mm f/2.8 macro prime lenses than the zooms but it looks like Tokina comes closest at delivering, IF the above conditions are met for me.

Bill
billferreira is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Feb 20, 2007, 11:47 AM   #9
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 1
Default

Are any of these new Tokina lenses available Yet?
cneedelman is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 5:36 PM.