Go Back   Steve's Digicams Forums >


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old Mar 10, 2003, 4:50 PM   #11
Senior Member
 
rych26's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 116
Default

Ah, thanks, Hyun...couldn't figure out why all the CLA-1 guys were going through all that...I also have the Tiffen...works great...you'd think that Olympus would make their adapter long enough so that you wouldn't need an additional step up ring.
rych26 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 11, 2003, 11:29 AM   #12
Senior Member
 
steve6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,050
Default

There's a reason for it but I'm buggered if I can remember what. Vinyetting maybe - how do you spell vignetting
steve6 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 11, 2003, 2:36 PM   #13
Senior Member
 
Mike_PEAT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 1,910
Default

The CLA-1 is a few years old, and it was designed for past cameras. Someone at Oly decided to reuse the CLA-1 for this camera design, but they didn't take into consideration the length of the tubevs. the length of the lens (makes one wonder why they didn't design the camera for the CLA-4 used on the C-7x0 series).

Anyway, with narrower diameter tubes you can get vignetting on wider angles...with the CLA-4 clones you can get as small as 37mm but when you start adding filters, and converters it will suffer more than with the CLA-4's 55mm...the downside of the CLA-4 and other tubes close to its diameter is flash shadow as the tube blocks part of the flash.

It's 6 of one problem, and half dozen of the other problem.
Mike_PEAT is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 8:26 AM.