Steve'sDigicams

ultrazoom22 · Oct 15, 2005, 9:51 PM

With the E-500 representing an improvement, but not an overwhelming improvement over the E-300, doesn't that make the E-300, two lens kit a real baragain?

Ultra

ultrazoom22 · Oct 16, 2005, 11:05 PM

nudge...nudge...I know that there are indeed folks out there who feel that the Olympus E-500 repesents a REAL improvement over the Olympus E-300.

Please share with me information that will re-direct my focusfrom the E-300 two lens outfit, to the new and so called "improved" E-500 two lens kit? The E-500 kit costs a full $150 more. This is critical, as I am about to place my order.

Ultra

Steven R · Oct 17, 2005, 12:33 PM

Hi Ultrazoom22: FYI: Check out the comparison chart on page 1 of the following link:

http://www.dpreview.com/articles/olympuse500/

Mikefellh · Oct 17, 2005, 3:08 PM

Also check out this site:

http://www.wrotniak.com/photo/oly-e/e500.html

ultrazoom22 · Oct 17, 2005, 10:24 PM

Thank you, Steven and Mike-

I have a better view on the differences. It was valuable info.

Ultra

rey · Oct 17, 2005, 11:21 PM

I've seen the difference between the two at around $100... I know $100 is a big deal to most people, including myself.

I'm waiting for my local costco to switch from the E-300 to the E-500. I'll buy it and check it out. I am considering it, but with Canon's Triple rebate on the Rebel XT and lenses, you can get a Canon XT, with better lens choices in the future for about $100 more.

You can check out my post on the canon lens section:
http://www.stevesforums.com/forums/v...mp;forum_id=65

The triple rebate ends in January so you have a lot of time to think about it. The Costco's around my area has the E-300, Nikon D50 and Canon Rebel XT, so I'll buy each one and compare them for myself and then decide which one I'll keep. Hopefully, before I decide one of them would carry the E-500 so I can check that one also. Thanks to Costco's liberal return policy! This is how camera shopping should be :-)

El Robo · Oct 18, 2005, 12:58 PM

Soooo....has anyone actually gotten one yet?

Norm in Fujino · Oct 18, 2005, 7:07 PM

El Robo wrote:

Quote:

Soooo....has anyone actually gotten one yet?

Quite a few, but they're not on this board.

El Robo · Oct 19, 2005, 12:38 AM

I think I'm ready to trade in my old FTN...the E-500 looks reasonable. What board have you seen where people have used one?

:cart:

sajdahgraphics · Oct 20, 2005, 2:02 PM

u cant just dismiss a camera based upon the specs. I WAS SO close to buying the E-1 based upon specs, but its noise was TERRIBLE @ high isos.

so, wait till it comes out, somepne buys it, an diss it when the pictures show up.

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version Email this Page	Search this Thread: Advanced Search

Steve'sDigicams

Recent Camera Reviews

Most Active Forums

Most Popular Deals

Latest Feature Articles

Oct 15, 2005, 9:51 PM	#21
ultrazoom22 Member Join Date: Oct 2005 Posts: 72	With the E-500 representing an improvement, but not an overwhelming improvement over the E-300, doesn't that make the E-300, two lens kit a real baragain? Ultra

Oct 16, 2005, 11:05 PM	#22
ultrazoom22 Member Join Date: Oct 2005 Posts: 72	nudge...nudge...I know that there are indeed folks out there who feel that the Olympus E-500 repesents a REAL improvement over the Olympus E-300. Please share with me information that will re-direct my focusfrom the E-300 two lens outfit, to the new and so called "improved" E-500 two lens kit? The E-500 kit costs a full $150 more. This is critical, as I am about to place my order. Ultra

Oct 17, 2005, 12:33 PM	#23
Steven R Senior Member Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Tampa, Florida Posts: 5,936	Hi Ultrazoom22: FYI: Check out the comparison chart on page 1 of the following link: http://www.dpreview.com/articles/olympuse500/

Oct 17, 2005, 3:08 PM	#24
Mikefellh Senior Member Join Date: May 2004 Location: Toronto, ON, Canada Posts: 1,707	Also check out this site: http://www.wrotniak.com/photo/oly-e/e500.html

Oct 17, 2005, 10:24 PM	#25
ultrazoom22 Member Join Date: Oct 2005 Posts: 72	Thank you, Steven and Mike- I have a better view on the differences. It was valuable info. Ultra

Oct 17, 2005, 11:21 PM	#26
rey Senior Member Join Date: Oct 2005 Posts: 949	I've seen the difference between the two at around $100... I know $100 is a big deal to most people, including myself. I'm waiting for my local costco to switch from the E-300 to the E-500. I'll buy it and check it out. I am considering it, but with Canon's Triple rebate on the Rebel XT and lenses, you can get a Canon XT, with better lens choices in the future for about $100 more. You can check out my post on the canon lens section: http://www.stevesforums.com/forums/v...mp;forum_id=65 The triple rebate ends in January so you have a lot of time to think about it. The Costco's around my area has the E-300, Nikon D50 and Canon Rebel XT, so I'll buy each one and compare them for myself and then decide which one I'll keep. Hopefully, before I decide one of them would carry the E-500 so I can check that one also. Thanks to Costco's liberal return policy! This is how camera shopping should be :-)

Oct 18, 2005, 12:58 PM	#27
El Robo Junior Member Join Date: Oct 2005 Posts: 4	Soooo....has anyone actually gotten one yet?

Oct 19, 2005, 12:38 AM	#29
El Robo Junior Member Join Date: Oct 2005 Posts: 4	I think I'm ready to trade in my old FTN...the E-500 looks reasonable. What board have you seen where people have used one? :cart:

Oct 20, 2005, 2:02 PM	#30
sajdahgraphics Member Join Date: Feb 2005 Posts: 62	u cant just dismiss a camera based upon the specs. I WAS SO close to buying the E-1 based upon specs, but its noise was TERRIBLE @ high isos. so, wait till it comes out, somepne buys it, an diss it when the pictures show up.