Go Back   Steve's Digicams Forums >

LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old Feb 15, 2010, 7:37 PM   #1
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 1,241
Default 50-200 review at Photozone

(if there is ad, i don't endorse it)

The 50-200 is tested by photozone. As a side note, this is the very first time I've seen a test delayed by a centering defect on a Zuiko lens.


As usual, the Zuiko reviewed very well.

fldspringer is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old Feb 15, 2010, 9:01 PM   #2
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Dallas, Texas USA
Posts: 6,589

I wondered if he was going to be obtaining a new copy, having noted the issue with the initial copy he had as well.

A while back I emailed him, asking if he was going to do any new 4/3rd's reviews. The initial, excellent reviews he did on the 50mm f2, 11-22, original 50-200 and original 14-54 f2.8-3.5 were never transferred to his new review site. He replied saying he most likely was not going to review any more 4/3rd's lenses in a response I am glad he eventually went back on.
Greg Chappell is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Feb 15, 2010, 9:48 PM   #3
Senior Member
zig-123's Avatar
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Cape Cod, Massachusetts
Posts: 5,190

Just finished reading the review a few minutes ago. I'm not surprised that his review was a positive one. The 50-200mm is one of the sharpest lens I own and it's the ED version. I someday, would love to get the SWD version. But there are just too many other issues that take priority right now.

Thanks for the heads up.

zig-123 is offline   Reply With Quote

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 4:35 AM.