Go Back   Steve's Digicams Forums >

LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old Oct 18, 2005, 11:11 PM   #1
Junior Member
agott123's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 9


I ´ve been using the S2 PRO for about two years. But since the new S3 Pro is no longer compatible with older Nikon TTL Flash or Metz with SCA adapter,and I have 3 of them, I took a serios look at the E-500. With the money I would get for my camera and lenses, I could buy 2 of the 2 lens kit...
BUT...is it a good deal ? So how can I know wich is better ?
I don´t mind the pixel nº, quite never shot with max resolution. But quality, noise, autofocus speed, lens qualty...

Any advices are welcome

S2 Pro
Nikkor 24-120 (Great)
Sigma 18-125 (so-so)
Nikkor 105mm F2.8 Macro
Metz 50MZ5
Metz 45CL-4
Metz 32MZ-3
agott123 is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old Nov 20, 2005, 12:07 AM   #2
Junior Member
fishumba's Avatar
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 8

The E500 certainly seems to be a bargain for what it delivers, but you may want to take a serious look at the E-1, which B&H is selling for $750 now. If you're budget is tight, you could likely pick up the E300/500 two lens kit, almost unused and pretty cheaply on Ebay. If you can manage it, though, the Oly 14-54 and 50f2 macro would be dynamite replacements for your 24-120 and 105 macro. I have an F80 and the same set of lenses, and found those two oly lenses to be prefect replacements...even slight upgrades.

And the E-1 is a camera you have to *handle* to really appreciate. A Nikon with the same build, 100% viewfinder and ergonomics would cost you four or five times as much!
fishumba is offline   Reply With Quote

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 1:35 AM.