Go Back   Steve's Digicams Forums >

LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old Apr 20, 2008, 10:34 AM   #31
Senior Member
tkurkowski's Avatar
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Maryland, USA
Posts: 3,625

HarjTT wrote:
Ted, if you do buy the 14-35, I'd like the honour of testing it for you, esp as I don;t have a problem taking the blame!
Hah! Now that will work well: "Well, dear wife, you know we Buddhists are supposed to help people. So the only reason I spent $2300 on a lens is that I have a friend in England who wants to try it out."

I'm aiming for the Leica - that extra stop of light, esp if your shooting in low light is going to be really useful and if needed I'll use my feet to zoom in a wee bit.
When shooting indoors I don't necessarily have the room to move around - sometimes it requires that I teleport myself through a wall and I haven't mastered that technique yet. Plus the wallwouldn'thelp the camera view anyway <grin>.

But Ialready have the Oly Zuiko D 50mm Macro f/2 so I'llprobably get the Leica 25mm. That will give me the equivalent of fast 50mm and 100mm, and between those two I should be OK indoors. Plus the two of them together are probably lighter in the camera bag than the 14-35 F2, albeit not as convenient.

However, I'll happily return your offer and try out the 14-35F2 if you get one.


PS: I honestly believe that eventually the price of the 14-35 F2 will come down in the future - I just can't imagine it has the same manufacturing cost as the 35-100 F/2.
tkurkowski is offline   Reply With Quote

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 2:38 PM.