Go Back   Steve's Digicams Forums >

LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old Nov 30, 2013, 7:12 AM   #11
Senior Member
mr.sneezy's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 204
Default Thanks.

Thanks guys.
If the E-M1 runs the older lenses like or close to what an E-3 can then I'd be happy with that for sure.

I did some reading up on the E-M1 after your replys though, and the E-M1's on-sensor phase detection may have caused some trouble with noise on long dark exposures like nightscapes or long bulb shots for lightning (both things I like to do). My E-520 is not very good for those tasks unfortunately, so I want to make sure the next body can do a better job than that. Maybe the E-M1 is still way ahead ?

PS. Nice shots Bob, the Arlington BRT's are impressive too

Last edited by mr.sneezy; Nov 30, 2013 at 7:16 AM.
mr.sneezy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov 30, 2013, 10:21 AM   #12
Senior Member
James Emory's Avatar
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Bay City, MI
Posts: 2,385

Bob, is there a very noticeable difference in IQ in the M1 over the E-3 using the same lens?
Olympus OMD-M5, HLG6 grip, Olympus 4/3rd 35mm macro lens, Panny/Leica 25mm, f1.4, Olympus 17mm, Canon Pro 9000 Mk II Printer, Canon MP990 Printer, Slik U212 Tripod, Manfrotto monopod, MMF3 converter.
James Emory is offline   Reply With Quote

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 4:15 AM.