Go Back   Steve's Digicams Forums >

LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old Dec 25, 2009, 8:22 AM   #1
Senior Member
gjtoth's Avatar
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Louisville, KY, USA
Posts: 6,944
Default Which one's better?

14-42mm or 14-45mm? I've read the 14-45mm is better but value your expertise in things like this.
Gary ---- "The best camera is the one you have with you."
Pentax K-70 ~ Panasonic FZ1000 ~ Panasonic ZS40

My Gallery

Hebrews 13:3
gjtoth is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old Dec 25, 2009, 9:06 AM   #2
Senior Member
boBBrennan's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Arlington, Texas USA
Posts: 3,585

.....both are pretty good! I have an original 14-45 f/3.5-4.5 which is a favorite I use mainly with my E-300. It makes up my 'lightweight pkg'.

Here are some samples ... http://tinyurl.com/ylfuem3

I shot these one morning 4 years ago at the Tyler, TX Rose Garden while waiting for a baseball game start. Just walking through the garden shooting some -auto program jpg- snapshots

I've not ever used a 14-42.
boBBrennan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Dec 25, 2009, 10:18 AM   #3
Senior Member
fldspringer's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 1,241
Default I used to have the 14-45...

I wasn't really impressed by it. It was not a consistant lens. Others swear by it and say the step to the 14-54 was a sideways move. It leads me to believe the old 14-45 has quite an amount of sample variation.

SLR gear has run the test on the 14-42 here:


and the 14-45 here:


I'm thinking the test resembles the sample I used to have. This old zuiko put other kit lenses to shame. It was more a measure how bad those other kit lenses were than how great this lens was. I think most agree the new outperforms the old here, but has a less robust build.

fldspringer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Dec 25, 2009, 11:44 AM   #4
Senior Member
mtclimber's Avatar
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Oregon, USA
Posts: 18,143


I agree there were indeed sample variations in the Zukio 14-45mm lens. The only sample of that lens I still have is the one that came wit the E-300 two lens kit and it seems pretty good, as is Bob's lens.

Merry Christmas!

Sarah Joyce
mtclimber is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Dec 25, 2009, 12:14 PM   #5
Senior Member
Steven R's Avatar
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Tampa, Florida
Posts: 5,930

I'll have to definitely vote for the 14-42mm. My sample has been a superb lens.

Steven R
Steven R is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Dec 25, 2009, 3:34 PM   #6
Senior Member
Mikefellh's Avatar
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Toronto, ON, Canada
Posts: 1,707

As someone with both a 14-45 & 14-42...a few years back with the 14-45 I started looking at the 14-42 since people kept saying how much better it is than the 14-45, so I tried one and wasn't impressed and the 14-42 was actually worse than the 14-45 (especially at the extremes), and I reported that the people who thought the 14-42 was better were nuts. That got me into a lot of trouble.

After that I tried another 14-42 and got the same results (I must have a very good copy of the 14-42). But I was looking for a smaller, lighter lens, so I gave the 14-42 one more try and I finally found a copy I was happy with.

Looks like there are good and bad copies of 14-42 too!

These days the 14-42 stays on one camera, and the 14-45 on the other, but I swap them if I take the other camera.
Mikefellh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Dec 25, 2009, 4:09 PM   #7
Senior Member
tkurkowski's Avatar
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Maryland, USA
Posts: 3,625

Originally Posted by Mikefellh View Post
That got me into a lot of trouble.
Hey - you gave it your best shot. Good for you.

tkurkowski is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jan 27, 2010, 11:18 AM   #8
Senior Member
turbines's Avatar
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 134
Default Which 14-42?

I'm a bit confused. There are two current 14-42mm lens; one is the kit lens and the other is the collapsible compact. The reviews I've read seem to point to the compact being the better of the two.
Paul G.

turbines is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jan 27, 2010, 12:14 PM   #9
Senior Member
zig-123's Avatar
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Cape Cod, Massachusetts
Posts: 5,191

In response to Turbines' question;

In the fourthirds system, Olympus makes the one 14-42mm 'kit' lens.

The collapsible 14-42mm lens you're referring to is designed to be used with the micro fourthirds system.


Last edited by zig-123; Jan 27, 2010 at 12:55 PM.
zig-123 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jan 27, 2010, 12:28 PM   #10
Senior Member
Greg Chappell's Avatar
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Dallas, Texas USA
Posts: 6,589

Originally Posted by gjtoth View Post
14-42mm or 14-45mm? I've read the 14-45mm is better but value your expertise in things like this.
With any lens, there's always the chance of getting a sub-par unit. I've had two samples of the 14-42 and have always liked the size.

That said, I've never been enamored with the range. A 3x zoom, even one as nice & small as this, seems pretty limiting when most of the time I'm using the 5x 12-60 Zuiko. The times I choose to have a light outfit on hand, and today is one of those days, I leave the 14-42 at home and take the 9-18 and 40-150 Zuikos. I also have the 25mm pancake, just in case, and because it's so light there's no reason not to have it in the bag no matter what else I am carrying.

If you are a live view user, the newer 14-42 is what you want because the older 14-45 does not support all of the AF options in live view and will not be updated to do so. The current 14-42 also received an update to work via a converter on the micro-four-thirds bodies.
Greg Chappell is offline   Reply With Quote

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 2:03 PM.