Go Back   Steve's Digicams Forums >

LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old Jul 15, 2006, 10:18 PM   #1
Senior Member
Brent Gair's Avatar
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 185

I was invited to a car show today. I love cars and I love photographing mechanical things. The 50mm F2 would have been my first choice but I knew I'd need a wide angle at an indoor even soI was "forced" to take only my 14-45mm kit lens.

Arriving at the convention center, I was horrified to discover that most of the lights were turned off. Apparently the tuner guys want to simulate a summer night.

Terrific. I have a slow kit lens with no external flash and no monopod. And people rag on the lens about not being sharp.

It almost seemed like it should be waste of time. But it doesn't cost anything to try so I walked around snapping pictures in the near dark. I got home and looked at the pictures on my computer. Hmmm...they looked good. Some looked real good.

I took this picture of a Mazda which I converted to B&W for the simple reason that I needed to use more black ink on my printer to even out the cartridges. I wanted to print it out as an 8x10.

Theoretically, this picture SHOULD be AWFUL. Hand held at 1/30 second (ISO 320) with only the camera's pop-up flash. The lens is at 14 mm and F-3.5. Yes...WIDE OPEN...so it should be quite soft and have minimal depth of field. This is the full frame with no cropping. I did print it out at 8X10 and I think it looks terrific. Last week, A guy on another forum called the 14-45mm "trash" and suggested people "throw it out". Well, don't believe everything you read.

Brent Gair is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old Jul 18, 2006, 7:53 PM   #2
fireman's Avatar
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 70

Looks good to me
fireman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 18, 2006, 11:17 PM   #3
Senior Member
stowaway7's Avatar
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 183

The 14-45 got a decent review at photozone.com as well...even when compared to the 14-54. The curves on the car pictured soften any barrell distortion at 14mm, a lot of straight lines may have shown a different story, but the lens worked well for the situation.I've handled the 14-45 (own a a 14-54, though) and have to admit it's one of the better quality kit lenses, having also handled the Nikon (on a D50) and Canon (on a Digital Rebel) rivals. For the price it's a strong performer.

stowaway7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Aug 4, 2006, 2:43 PM   #4
Junior Member
sparklite's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 3

Frankly I can't stand the kit lens. I've tried two as I thought the first had defects. It's great for smaller work but it lacks the shadow defition, and that famous "olympus colour" not to mention the soft edges it creates. Put it against the Olympus 14-54mm and it gets blown out of the water. The E-series cameras I love. That lens I h-a-t-e.
sparklite is offline   Reply With Quote

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 9:53 PM.