Go Back   Steve's Digicams Forums >

LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old May 30, 2012, 2:41 AM   #1
Senior Member
HarjTT's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 4,555
Default Would you buy an E-7 if it were intro'd this year ?

Just interested to see how many of us would be pick up an E-7 or E-5MKII if Oly introduced one later on this year ?

Spec wise, lets assume its the same body as the E3/E5 but incorporates at least:
* Tweaked EM5 sensor - 16MP but improved over the EM5 if its possible
* Improved OLED screen - higher res but same size as the E5's.
* 5 axis -IBIS
*The latest true-pic image but again tweaked again like previous E-X's

So thats basically an EM5 shoe horned into the E5 body.

My own personal improvements in addition to the above:
* a significantly improved and accurate AF system - doesn't have to be 5DM3 fast but just accurate.
* eye cup that doesnt fall off,
* AF lamp built into the body
* Shave a few mm off the body all over, so that would make it smaller than an E1/E3/E5.
* Increase the size of the OVF

I'd upgrade from my E3 to an E7 if it came out with those features but would you ?



HarjTT is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old May 30, 2012, 5:57 AM   #2
Leeston's Avatar
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Canberra Australia
Posts: 62

Yes, I probably would given my investment into the lens that I have purchased.
Cheers from Oz


E-3 14-42mm 18-180mm, 70-300mm
Leeston is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 30, 2012, 6:03 AM   #3
Senior Member
tkurkowski's Avatar
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Maryland, USA
Posts: 3,625

Hi, Harj

Going from an E3 to an E7 with those specs would make sense for folks who can afford it. Going up from an E5 would be a more difficult decision. For me it would depend on the difference in high-ISO quality - from what I can tell the EM5 is just one stop better and I doubt I will spend that much money for one stop (assuming I have the money and/or the value of a used E5 doesn't plummet).

To me it seems unlikely that Oly will release an E7 that's simply an EM5 in a 4/3 body - they're usually more innovative than that. They would really get my attention if the E7 finally has a pro-class AF system.


PS: regarding the eyecup falling off, see if you can get Blu-Tack in Britian - it's commonly used in the graphic arts world:


A little piece of that at the bottom of the eyecup mount before you slide the eyecup in, will solve the problem.

Last edited by tkurkowski; May 30, 2012 at 6:07 AM.
tkurkowski is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 30, 2012, 6:52 AM   #4
Senior Member
gjtoth's Avatar
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Louisville, KY, USA
Posts: 6,944

Probably not. Back when I first started in IT stuff, I'd chase the latest and greatest thing that came along. After shoveling a LOT of money into this practice, I discovered that the benefits of doing so were minimal at best. I fell into that mindset when I first got into photography and, while I undeniably derived huge benefits, I believe I'm at a point "diminishing returns" if I were to make a jump to an E-7. It would have to be something pretty spectacular to compel me to jump.
Gary ---- "The best camera is the one you have with you."
Pentax K-70 ~ Panasonic FZ1000 ~ Panasonic ZS40

My Gallery

Hebrews 13:3
gjtoth is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 30, 2012, 10:42 AM   #5
Senior Member
Steven R's Avatar
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Tampa, Florida
Posts: 5,932

I hope they come out with the E-7, in order to keep the 4/3 line going. However, for my photography, I'm still very satisfied with the E-3, and am still learning all it is capable of delivering.

(I used to be an early adopter when young, but now I rarely buy the first generation, prefer to wait until the early bugs are worked out.)
Steven R is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 30, 2012, 3:05 PM   #6
Senior Member
Mikefellh's Avatar
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Toronto, ON, Canada
Posts: 1,707

I only bought an E-3 last year because I got it for $400 with around 4000 actuations on it, and I only got it because I figured they would never make another FourThirds camera, and I certainly wasn't going to get a Micro 4/3.

Of course all that was before the announcement of the OM-D, which was the first new camera I had bought in over 10 years (I've bought end of line, open box, and used but never new, and certainly not bleeding edge).

So no I won't be buying another boat anchor, I mean the E-7.
Mikefellh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 30, 2012, 3:28 PM   #7
Senior Member
HarjTT's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 4,555

I still find the E3 more than good enough for a camera thats coming up to being 4 years old and esp when paired up with the 35-100F2.

If and when an E7 does show up and they have mentioned that an E5 replacement is in the works, it will need to be a real step up from E5 and EM5, esp in terms of AF performance and accuracy. Whether that ever happens is another thing. Combined with a better sensor I'd be seriously looking at it but it would need to be priced realistically - ie. not the same price as 5DMKII or D700 which is what they did with the E5 in the UK and the prices have only now after 2 years started to drop.

Mike, I had a wee play with the OMD last week ..not long enough for my liking but I did like the camera, so it'd be nice to have more time with one. However, it felt too small to me at times and although I'm sure I'd get used it. Something just a wee bit larger would be ideal and I could see myself with one. What I didn;t like was the new MZD kit lens - in the pics it looks a magnificent and well made lens but in reality on the OMD it felt cheaply made and uninsipiring even when compared to the 14-54ZD. So if in 6-8 months from now, if the E3 kicked the bucket and it was a choice between the EM5 and an E7, it would be the E7 for me.

Last edited by HarjTT; May 30, 2012 at 3:30 PM.
HarjTT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 30, 2012, 3:58 PM   #8
Junior Member
Only1Watchdog's Avatar
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Oshawa, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 15

If Olympus came out with a new proline 4/3rd's camera I would not be quick to buy. My E-3 suits my needs right now. However, it would restore my faith in them staying with the 4/3rd's line a bit longer and I would buy a new lens or 2

E-1, E-3, 14-54mm, 50mm Macro, 70-300mm
Only1Watchdog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 30, 2012, 4:54 PM   #9
Senior Member
Lordje's Avatar
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Harelbeke, Belgium
Posts: 765

The E-3 does anything I want so far.
If Olympus would make a trade in offer on the body what is really good then yes maybe I would just for having the newest.
But otherwise no, I stick with my E-3 as long it works.
One photo out of focus is a mistake, ten photo out of focus are an experimentation, one hundred photo out of focus are a style.

Nikon D800, Olympus E-500
Lordje is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jun 9, 2012, 4:20 AM   #10
Junior Member
ElDonQujote's Avatar
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 1

Yes, I would since the IQ of Olympus lenses is second to none. I have a significant investment in 4/3rd lenses and some OM lenses. IMHO lenses come first, body second. How quickly I would move will depend on the features (I liked the personal list of features above). A surprise of 18-20MP would be nice provided it translates into fully leveraged SHG lenses, lower or same noise levels as the E-5, built-in GPS, retain some of the art filters (dramatic, vivid, several B&W), and a camera integrated battery grip. I like the shape of the E-5 it could be a bit smaller but larger than the e620 (which is a really nice cam). So marketing staff at Olympus please listen to your customers.

Greetings from Auckland, NZ

PS. I don't take pictures in complete darkness, print wall-sized or use ISO 125,000 or need a camera that can only be operated with the little pinky or pencils.

E-5, e620, Leica Digilux-3
150mm f2|90mm f2|50mm f2|25mm f1.4|14-35mm f2|7-14mm f4|12-60mm f2.8|50-200mm f2.8|300mm f4.5|TC 1.4|TC 2.0|EX25
ElDonQujote is offline   Reply With Quote

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:12 AM.