Go Back   Steve's Digicams Forums > Digital SLR and Interchangeable Lens Cameras > Olympus dSLR

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old Oct 29, 2007, 2:04 PM   #1
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,066
Default

here are 60 Olympus E-3 images

http://www.dcview.com/article/newrea...sp&id=5705

user name; yws, password 123456

Riley
Rriley is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old Oct 29, 2007, 3:11 PM   #2
Senior Member
 
HarjTT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 4,534
Default

Hi Rob

Thanks for that link I'll take a wee look and see what the E3's outputting. I've been reading about DR and whether its more or less than before - I've read Pana's statement that the new NMOS sensor for the L10 has the same DR as the one in the L1/E330 and I'm assuming that the E3's using either the same sensor or something very similar.

Cheers

Harj


HarjTT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Oct 29, 2007, 3:20 PM   #3
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,066
Default

hi Harj
yes i suspect the sensors are the same in basis

seems DR is going to be different
(sure wish they would offer firmware for better jpeg DR for 510/410)

take a look at the images of glasses hanging upside down
one is a slow shutter iso100, the other is iso1600
doesnt seem too bad at all

Riley
Rriley is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Oct 29, 2007, 3:50 PM   #4
Senior Member
 
tkurkowski's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Maryland, USA
Posts: 3,625
Default

Rriley wrote:
Quote:
take a look at the images of glasses hanging upside down
one is a slow shutter iso100, the other is iso1600
doesnt seem too bad at all
Hi, Riley

The ISO1600 image seems to have more noise than the few other ISO1600 E3 images that have been posted.

Ted

PS: How did you read the EXIF files? BabelFish?
tkurkowski is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Oct 29, 2007, 3:58 PM   #5
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,066
Default

open the image first
read EXIF in the normal manner

the glasses upside down:

Camera Make: OLYMPUS IMAGING CORP.
Camera Model: E-3
Image Date: 2007:10:27 12:36:55
Flash Used: No
Focal Length: 53.0mm
Exposure Time: 0.033 s (1/30)
Aperture: f/3.5
ISO equiv: 1600
Exposure Bias: -0.30
White Balance: Auto
Metering Mode: Matrix
Exposure: aperture priority (semi-auto)
Exposure Mode: Manual

where did you see the 'better' ones ?
Rriley is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Oct 29, 2007, 6:23 PM   #6
Senior Member
 
tkurkowski's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Maryland, USA
Posts: 3,625
Default

Rriley wrote:
Quote:
open the image first
read EXIF in the normal manner

where did you see the 'better' ones ?
Hi Riley

I tried to open the EXIF hyperlink which is in Japanese - didn't think about looking at the EXIF in English after I downloaded the image - thanks.

The other high-ISO images are here:

http://masterchong.com/v2/choosing/olympus-e3-iso-100-iso-3200-sample-image.html

But I admit that it's difficult to compare noise in images unless they're at the same magnification and the above link doesn't make that easy to do. So I was just statingmy first impression between the two. I must say though, that displayed full-screen on my Sony 19" Pantone-calibrated LCD monitor, the two glassware images look very similar in terms of noise. It's only when you look at the ISO1600 image in its natural BMP size that you see a lot more noise.

Ted
tkurkowski is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov 11, 2007, 11:50 PM   #7
Senior Member
 
atlantagreg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 243
Default

Nice shots.

Since I can't read the language, can someone tell me if they specified what lens(s) they used?
atlantagreg is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:32 AM.