Go Back   Steve's Digicams Forums > Digital SLR and Interchangeable Lens Cameras > Olympus dSLR

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old Nov 1, 2007, 6:08 PM   #1
Senior Member
 
HarjTT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 4,535
Default

Here's a link to some L10 samples taken with a pre-production camera.

http://www.photographyblog.com/revie...l10_photos.php

Also this review which was first linked over at dpr:

http://www.photoreview.com.au/Panaso...ix-dmcl10.aspx

Quiet promising so far - esp with low noise even at ISo1600, whcih i read in this months Digital Photography Monthly, which stated that high ISO was a big improvement over the L1 and yet the L10 still has the same IQ. Looks as if the L10 is going to be an interesting camera and possible alterantive to the E3, esp if its available body only as it is in Japan - the price of the L10 is even less than the 510. According to one poster at dpr, who attended a DMC L10 release in Japan, build quality and ergonomics are better than the E510.

http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/re...q=l10&qf=m

Here's another preview with sample images:

http://www.trustedreviews.com/digita...-on-Preview/p1

Cheers

HarjTT


HarjTT is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old Nov 5, 2007, 4:29 PM   #2
Senior Member
 
tkurkowski's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Maryland, USA
Posts: 3,625
Default

HarjTT wrote:
Quote:
Looks as if the L10 is going to be an interesting camera and possible alterantive to the E3, esp if its available body only as it is in Japan - the price of the L10 is even less than the 510. According to one poster at dpr, who attended a DMC L10 release in Japan, build quality and ergonomics are better than the E510.
Still, the in-body IS of the 510 or E3 is an attractive feature, especially with long lenses.

Ted
tkurkowski is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov 6, 2007, 1:40 AM   #3
Senior Member
 
jorgen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 200
Default

I agree fully with tkurkowski. I hardly ever carry a tripod and won't even look at cameras without IS. Only having IS in lenses is unnecessary, heavy and expensive; I like a light system.

Jorgen
http://www.photoblog.com/jorgen

jorgen is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 1:47 PM.