Go Back   Steve's Digicams Forums > Digital SLR and Interchangeable Lens Cameras > Olympus dSLR

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old Dec 9, 2008, 7:37 PM   #1
Senior Member
 
mtclimber's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Oregon, USA
Posts: 18,143
Default

Well, with new camera, an E-520,in hand-

The Cable Man was my subject. I used the Fl-50 with a diffusser to fill out the shadows.

Sarah Joyce
Attached Images
 
mtclimber is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old Dec 9, 2008, 11:12 PM   #2
Senior Member
 
Tullio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 7,370
Default

Nice capture, Sarah. How do you like the E520?
Tullio is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Dec 10, 2008, 7:42 AM   #3
Senior Member
 
mtclimber's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Oregon, USA
Posts: 18,143
Default

Hi Tullio-

Well, honestly,I am so new to the E-520 that I have barely gotten my feet wet. The E-520 appears to be a great camera, and it will keep me busy learning all of the in's and out's of it for quite awhile, I am sure.

Sarah Joyce
mtclimber is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Dec 10, 2008, 2:07 PM   #4
Senior Member
 
zig-123's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Cape Cod, Massachusetts
Posts: 5,145
Default

Hi Sarah,

First off, I wish you good luck with the E-520.

Secondly, I do have to apologize to you as I didn'tsee your question relative to my thought on either the E-520 or the e-420 in another post 'til now.

I do have to ask you why you chose to get the E-520?

If you don't mind my candor, I know that your a frequent contributor to the "what camera should I buy? Forum. Iusually scan it most every day and based on the input by the regulars, I get the clear sense that the Olympus line of DSLRs are pretty much treated like the red-headed stepchild of the family. So you have to understand that I'm a bit surprised that you wouldget one.

I want to be clear that I'm not saying that you dismiss the Olympus brand necessarily. Just that most of the respondants simply dismiss Olympus out of hand.

I realize that you just got it. So, after you get a chance to familiarize yourself with it, it would ge good to hear what you think.

regards,

Zig


zig-123 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Dec 10, 2008, 2:44 PM   #5
Senior Member
 
mtclimber's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Oregon, USA
Posts: 18,143
Default

Hi Zig-

I had an E-410 which I was unhappy with due to its very limited dynamic range. I also had an E-500 which has become outdated.

I did a lot of research paying particular attention to E-520 photos, and how it seemed like the E-520, while not a huge leap forward, was producing great looking results for other photographers. I also noted that the price for the E-520 body had fallen substantially. So, with the advantage of adding built-in IS via the body. and in view of the fact that I had all of the lenses, and a FL-50 flash it was a pretty easy choice.

Now by Photokina 2009 I might be laid back on my heels by what Olympus brings out as a new E-530, but I was willing to take a chance. You are correct, I am only two days into the E-520, but I like what I am seeing.

I was out on the back deck this morning shooting the neighbor's house. I wanted to test how the E-520 handled a white house in bright sunshine, using auto WB. I was pleased.

I promise to keep you posted.

Sarah Joyce
Attached Images
 
mtclimber is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:01 PM.