Go Back   Steve's Digicams Forums > Digital SLR and Interchangeable Lens Cameras > Olympus dSLR

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old Sep 7, 2010, 6:42 AM   #1
Senior Member
 
HarjTT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 4,534
Default Oly SHG lenes expensive.. may be not !

Well I always though Oly's SHG lenes were a wee bit spendy but right now they seem to be very competively priced.

What caught my eye over at "the onlinephotographer" was Nikon has released a new 200-400F4 VR II lens aimed for the wildlife shooters. No price was quoted so I had assumed that as it was an F4, it wouldn;t be more than say 2k-2.5k... but then I checked the link below:

http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/produc...00mm_f_4G.html

That new Nikkor makes the SHG 90-250F2.8 look cheap !!!!! I know I'd want the Oly any day of the week - plus a sherpa to carry it for me! The 35-100F2 is also cheaper than Canon's new 70-200F2.8L USM ISII, although the Canon is lighter and also going to focus faster. The 35-100F2 is sightly cheaper than the Nikkor 70-200F2.8 VR.

Cheers

Harj

Last edited by HarjTT; Sep 7, 2010 at 7:08 AM.
HarjTT is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old Sep 7, 2010, 11:13 AM   #2
Senior Member
 
Steven R's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Tampa, Florida
Posts: 5,910
Default

That's more than I paid for my first car!
Steven R is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Sep 7, 2010, 11:17 AM   #3
Senior Member
 
Scouse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Camano Island, WA.
Posts: 2,328
Default

That's 3 times what I paid for my first house in Engerland..!

I'd go for it...... if I were you Harj.
__________________
Ken.
"You are who you pretend to be."
Kurt Vonnegut Jnr.
Scouse is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Sep 7, 2010, 12:07 PM   #4
Senior Member
 
HarjTT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 4,534
Default

not on my salary and theyre not very discreet ... !
HarjTT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Sep 7, 2010, 12:54 PM   #5
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Dallas, Texas USA
Posts: 6,520
Default

I am sure for the intended use of tracking and shooting moving wildlife the Nikkor performs on a level we do not see with any Olympus body/lens combination. At those optical levels, they ALL are way, way, way outta my league and most everyone elses. Always have been, but the guys who use them to make a living always seem to find a way to afford one and the guy at Luminous Landscape always seem to buy one of everything just because he can.
Greg Chappell is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Sep 7, 2010, 1:11 PM   #6
Senior Member
 
tkurkowski's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Maryland, USA
Posts: 3,625
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Scouse View Post
That's 3 times what I paid for my first house in Engerland..!

I'd go for it...... if I were you Harj.
Fortunately a Nikon mount is easily adapted to a 4/3 mount.

On a serious note, I've always wondered why the outstanding Carl Zeiss lenses (most of which are manual focus) are never considered as options for 4/3 cameras, in the Nikon mount with a 4/3 adapter. Using them on a 4/3 camera wouldn't be any different than using them on a Nikon APS-C camera, right?

Ted
tkurkowski is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 5:33 PM.