Go Back   Steve's Digicams Forums > Digital SLR and Interchangeable Lens Cameras > Olympus dSLR

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old Mar 25, 2011, 9:43 AM   #11
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,066
Default

how does the DR compare
is that 'better' than the moderate improvement in ISO?

IMO the real gains from GH2 sensor are video and multi format
Rriley is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 25, 2011, 10:33 AM   #12
Senior Member
 
zig-123's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Cape Cod, Massachusetts
Posts: 5,145
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bobbert View Post
I'm in the same boat, except that I've ADDED lenses to my kit (9-18 and 50mm macro to go with the 12-60 and kit lenses) and upgraded the body to the e30 cheap on ebay. This meets my needs 90% (better noise performance and higher ISO would be nice) but I now feel I have a good enough system to wait out the uncertanties, and when the oly "pro" mft body is a reality I'll have a path to move to. If it never materializes, then I'll see about switching to another brand. Meantime I have years of fun ahead of me...
Well said.

Zig
__________________
http://scortoncreekgallery.smugmug.com/

So you want to be a better photographer? Open your eyes and take a look at what is all around you.
zig-123 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 25, 2011, 11:11 AM   #13
Senior Member
 
Steven R's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Tampa, Florida
Posts: 5,901
Default

Interesting comments and observations. But has anybody wondered about the research and patents that Oly is now doing on electro-translucent fixed mirrors for dslrs? Seems like a mirror that would not have to flip up and down would simplify costs, increase the reliability, and be easier to incorporate in a pro body than putting an EVF on it.
Steven R is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 25, 2011, 2:36 PM   #14
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Dallas, Texas USA
Posts: 6,483
Default

Sony's a33 and a55 cameras seem similar and they use an EVF. I have a feeling if Olympus is able, ecomonically, to develope whatever it is that's up their sleeve (assuming there is something), it will almost certainly have an EVF.

Last edited by Greg Chappell; Mar 25, 2011 at 5:07 PM.
Greg Chappell is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 25, 2011, 8:53 PM   #15
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,066
Default

translucent mirror tech is only going to work if they can offer something back that todays SLRs dont have. And where for the Sony at least the 'focus' is on AF performance and how frame rate can be increased. Good areas to look into if your main weakness is on AF.

The other form of AF using phased CDAF off the sensor ala' Fuji's patent might not be all that brilliant in low light (Im not saying it is, Im saying it might be) as the pixels by size would be less than those off of say Canons CMOS AF sensor.

Multi format is another, b/se now the EVF can display only the chosen format, and those formats can be optimised onto the sensor instead of all cropped from a 4x3 frame. Another function is live WB, where what you see is what you get, and something that traditionally we have done pretty well at in AWB.

Last edited by Rriley; Mar 25, 2011 at 8:56 PM.
Rriley is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 2:39 PM.