Go Back   Steve's Digicams Forums > Digital SLR and Interchangeable Lens Cameras > Olympus dSLR

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old Jan 7, 2005, 10:22 AM   #1
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 2
Default

I have oportunity to use both cameras, but have to make a decision to get one...

Here is what I found so far, and would appreciate other Olympus owners opinions and experience about the following.

Olympus produces sharper images than Canon 20D. More of the subject is detailed and perfectly in focus. Also images have life-like and natural appearance.

Colors do seem more natural and defined on Olympus E-1...

Overall... Olympus E-1 images simply jump off the screen and have more 3D effect.

Images from Canon 20D do not exibit this and appear soft.

I used built in flash on Canon 20D, and FL-20 on Olympus... Is it possible that the flash made all the difference?


korto is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old Jan 8, 2005, 11:51 AM   #2
Senior Member
 
Paul(UK)'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 290
Default

Did you use RAW or JPG?

I have the 20D and my father has the E-1. My images do look flat compared to his, but if I tweek the settings on the raw converter it makes them look as good.
Paul(UK) is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jan 9, 2005, 1:06 AM   #3
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 2
Default

I have another day to decide... I am starting to like 20D for detail levels, but still trying to figure out why it blows highlight details away often. Also, I am using JPEG on both cameras for now... For now Olympus has edge in highlight details and AWB.

Canon 20D is superior for image details, resolution and focusing/framerate speed...but feels less solid.


korto is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Feb 16, 2005, 11:05 AM   #4
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 2
Default

Having owned Nikon, Canon, Leica R from the world of film format, I was searcing for a digital camera that approached the delineation of color and ability to produce pastels and skin tones the way only Leica could. Nikon was good and Canon was flat. Both were not in the league of Leica. I have come to believe that the purity of glass is the critical determinant and with Leica the price you pay is for that last 20% of purity that delivers the "open window" I also owned an Olympus Stylus 35mm point and shoot and was always amazed at how close the color image quality was to my Leica. It was therefore no surprise that in evaluating the whole world of digital I have found that Olympus is producidng the best purity and subtleness of color and matched with good electronics. (Leica still suffers in the body and electronics area). I am not talking sharpness or boldness or vividness. I am talking about the ability to create the subtle shadings between the basic colors. This has been reinforced by my dealer an another photographer. Canon probably has the best electronics and weaker glass, Nikon probably does their overall good work, Leica overcomes their bodies and electronics with awesome glass. and Olympus produces awesome glass and good electronics and bodies. I have to have "that" color capability and won't compromise on it ever since I was injected with a Leica. So Olympus wins me.
imagin is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:50 AM.