Go Back   Steve's Digicams Forums > Digital SLR and Interchangeable Lens Cameras > Olympus dSLR

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old Apr 13, 2006, 11:41 AM   #1
Senior Member
 
kezs's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 139
Default

does anyone here know how they compare? the oly 40-150 comes with the kit for an extra 100 bucks, and the sigma goes for around 150 these days. I think the oly is a bit brighter. anyway, if they're similar in image quality, I'd go for the extra mms... slrgear.com speaks wonders about the oly one, but they didn't test the sigma.

thanks.
kezs is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old Apr 13, 2006, 12:12 PM   #2
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 134
Default

http://www.wrotniak.net/photo/oly-e/si-055-200.html

http://www.photographyreview.com/cat...1_3128crx.aspx

Good article on it. I was looking for a better lens than the 40-150 for outside zoom shooting for my European trip. Still reading the entire review on it. Did not find much on this site.



mckennma is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Apr 13, 2006, 1:02 PM   #3
Senior Member
 
mtclimber's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Oregon, USA
Posts: 18,143
Default

Ihave used the Zukio 50-150mm lens now for over a year andI like it very much. It is optically very good and the size is very convenient. Before buying the Zukio 50-150mm, I used a friends Sigma 55-200mm lens, and i really was not satisfied with it.

MT
mtclimber is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Apr 13, 2006, 1:05 PM   #4
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 134
Default

Most don't have great things to say about it. I look at it this way. $149 for the 55-200 at B&H. What do you expect from a $149 lens? If the pictures are clear and it does a decent daytime job shooting, it might be worth it. With most lens the zoom end of it usually has issues with quality. I think some want to compare it to better lens of 2-3x the price.
mckennma is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Apr 13, 2006, 1:32 PM   #5
Senior Member
 
kezs's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 139
Default

yeah I see what you mean, mckennma. and thanks for those links, they're really helpful. the olympus-dedicated website is on my bookmarks.

the 55-200 seems to do a pretty fine job for its price. judging by the samples on that website, though, the 40-150 really does seem like and outstanding lens for its price (100 with the bundle). come to think of it, I really don't need the extra 50mm. I'd use it occasionally... but that's it. and the extra EVs on the oly do help.

I'm wondering, though: do you think I could use a step-down right to use the Tcon 1.7x converter, which has a 55mm back thread, with the oly 40-150, with a 58mm front thread?

thanks for the help, folks.:|
kezs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Apr 13, 2006, 2:15 PM   #6
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 134
Default

No clue. My knowledge of cameras is based on common sense and what looks good.

This is my first DSLR. I used a Canon S45 and S1 IS on my last trip to Europe in 2004.
http://69.47.81.240

I am playing with my E-500 and three lens: 14-45, 14-54 f/2.8, and 40-150. I have a good target for my 40-150 and a Canon S1 IS with a 10X zoom, 38-380. At the end of my street 3/8s of a mile away is a Pepsi trailer that I practice shooting with. I can post pictures of it tonight. The 10X zoom is 432mm equivalent. I used it for close ups on my 2003 trip.I wanted one camera with better low light capabilities than my S45 4MP and decent zoom similar to my S1 IS 3.2MP with 10x zoom.

I go by price vs quality when buying cameras. What do I expect for $? The 40-150 did a nice job even at maximum zoom. I could see the Pepsi truck and its dents in the side. It was not crystal clear. It was acceptable.

I considered the 55-200 for a better zoom but have not tested the 40-150. This is what I used my zoom for.

My S45 shot of the relief on the Partheon
http://69.47.81.240/Vacation/2004/Gr...45_0026_RJ.htm

S1 IS close up of the relief on the Partheon
http://69.47.81.240/Vacation/2004/Gr...CE_S1_2559.htm





mckennma is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Apr 13, 2006, 2:26 PM   #7
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 134
Default

Googled it

http://www.cs.mtu.edu/~shene/DigiCam...-Infinity.html

Let google be your friend. You get a lot of opinions and usually many pictures.
mckennma is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Apr 14, 2006, 1:12 AM   #8
Senior Member
 
kezs's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 139
Default

mckennma,

I think the best I can say is "nice to meet you".

there's a lot of information there. nice pictures, those in europe.

your insight has been really helpful. like I said, nice to meet you, and we'll keep talking.
kezs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Apr 14, 2006, 8:48 AM   #9
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 134
Default

Considering you had one other posting on your question, I at least gave you other places to look. Sorry,I could not offer you any other insight.

From what I was reading, it does not seem like a good option compared to the 55-200 for $149. It seems like it would cause issues with photo quality or its benefit. A poor man's zoom lens. Since the 55-200 is a low cost option to replace the 40-150, it might be worth looking at. From what I read it does $149 worth of quality.


mckennma is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Apr 14, 2006, 10:04 AM   #10
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 824
Default

kezs wrote:
Quote:
the 55-200 seems to do a pretty fine job for its price. judging by the samples on that website, though, the 40-150 really does seem like and outstanding lens for its price (100 with the bundle). come to think of it, I really don't need the extra 50mm. I'd use it occasionally... but that's it. and the extra EVs on the oly do help.
I can't help you with the idea of adding converters to the front of a lens (I personally wouldn't try it, but that's me), but if you're really concerned about image quality, go for the Oly 40-150, not the Sigma. If you're trying to shoot small objects (birds, etc.) at distance, you won't really get much use from the last 50mm of the Sigma, since it is very soft once you get past 150. From all the example shots I've seen, the Oly is a really exceptional lens for the price. For a comparison of the Sigma 55-200 and Oly 50-200, see THIS EARLIER THREAD.


Norm in Fujino is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 3:17 PM.