Go Back   Steve's Digicams Forums > Digital SLR and Interchangeable Lens Cameras > Olympus Micro Four Thirds

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old May 18, 2010, 4:08 PM   #1
Super Moderator
 
Hards80's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Cleveland, OH
Posts: 9,046
Default Olympus E-PL1 and Vivitar Ser 1. 105mm 2.5

Fully Extended to 1:1





Closed, normal



__________________
MyFlickr
Hards80 is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old May 18, 2010, 4:12 PM   #2
Senior Member
 
shoturtle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Frankfurt AM
Posts: 11,348
Default

That lens looks huge on the epl-1
__________________
Super Frequent Flyer, no joke. Ex Patriot and loving it.
Canon Eos 60D, T1i/500D, Eos1, Eos 630, Olympus EPL-1, and a part time Pentax K-X shooter.
shoturtle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 18, 2010, 4:55 PM   #3
Super Moderator
 
Hards80's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Cleveland, OH
Posts: 9,046
Default

didn't get many good examples. today was just too dark, and windy. i could not keep up shutter speeds to combat the wind, as that 105mm x2 crop factor really magnifies any subject movement. got this one, probably because i bumped up the ISO to 400

__________________
MyFlickr
Hards80 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 18, 2010, 4:59 PM   #4
Senior Member
 
shoturtle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Frankfurt AM
Posts: 11,348
Default

That is very sharp, the water droplet is magnified the part of the flower also, very cool
__________________
Super Frequent Flyer, no joke. Ex Patriot and loving it.
Canon Eos 60D, T1i/500D, Eos1, Eos 630, Olympus EPL-1, and a part time Pentax K-X shooter.
shoturtle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 18, 2010, 5:14 PM   #5
Senior Member
 
zig-123's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Cape Cod, Massachusetts
Posts: 5,145
Default

Hi Dustin,
Impressive looking combination.

But I do have a question: are you, at all concerned about the weight of a large lens such as the one mounted to the camera without any supplemental support to take part of the load (weight) off the mount of the E-PL1?

Mind you, I haven't had a chance to actually take a lens off , inspect the mounting system and look at it's build/ Just something that jumped out at me when I saw your combo.

Zig
zig-123 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 18, 2010, 6:41 PM   #6
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: south west pennsylvania
Posts: 415
Default

Dustin, nice setup, I have a series 1, 70-210mm macro vivitar in canon fd mount, I've been thinking about getting an adapter to try it and some of my old canon fd lenses. from what I have read the series 1 vivitars are the ones to have if you want image quality with digital sensors, I think your image proves the point.


Zig, the front-end is seemingly solid on my e-pl1, it would be the thought of my thumb going through the speaker holes while hand-holding on the back that could be of concern, as the back feels very fragile to me.
Charles

Last edited by cshanaberger; May 18, 2010 at 9:14 PM.
cshanaberger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 18, 2010, 6:46 PM   #7
Super Moderator
 
Hards80's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Cleveland, OH
Posts: 9,046
Default

Shoturtle, Zig, Charles. thank you all.

My EPL1 mount feels very solid. I was holding it with one hand today with tripod in other hand most of the day even with it full extended which is quite a bit of torque, and never once worried about the lens mount or the grip/body. Actually it never even crossed my mind until you asked.

Charles, the viv 70-210 is one of my next intended purchases. I figured out today that the 1:2 to 1:3 macro of the viv 70-210 (depending on model) would be plenty for the majority of my needs, and being more flexible.
__________________
MyFlickr
Hards80 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 18, 2010, 8:10 PM   #8
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Dallas, Texas USA
Posts: 6,483
Default

I used to have a whole set of that stuff in Nikon F mount....the 28mm f1.9, 35-85 f2.8, 90mm f2.5 with the tube, 135 f2.3 and 90-180 f4.5 Flat Field, and a Vivitar 24mm f2 non-Series 1 that focussed extremely close and was a sharp as any 24mm f2 Nikkor. You can certainly do a lot worse. What you couldn't do, was carry it all at one time in your bag!

From the looks of that one shot, you should kick it up to ISO 400 more often....maybe even 800. Tack sharp. I'd want that electronic eyelevel finder to shoot with one of these lenses.

Last edited by Greg Chappell; May 18, 2010 at 8:12 PM.
Greg Chappell is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 18, 2010, 8:47 PM   #9
Super Moderator
 
Hards80's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Cleveland, OH
Posts: 9,046
Default

Thanks Greg.

Yea, it did turn out quite sharp. that 90 2.5 with tube was my other choice, I just found this one at a good price first. both are excellent macros.
__________________
MyFlickr
Hards80 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 19, 2010, 1:13 AM   #10
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Washington State
Posts: 930
Default

Do the Series one lenses suffer from the lack of quality control other Vivitar lenses do? I have thought about adding the 100/2.5 but my experience with Vivitar has been so hit and miss I think I'd probably go for the 90/2.5 Tamron instead.

Great shots and a nice looking lens.
John
jelow1966 is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:35 AM.