Go Back   Steve's Digicams Forums > Digital SLR and Interchangeable Lens Cameras > Olympus Micro Four Thirds

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old Dec 2, 2011, 12:14 PM   #1
Senior Member
 
James Emory's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Bay City, MI
Posts: 2,378
Default VF-2 vs VF-3?

Wondering what the difference is besides price. All I seem to come up with is that it is smaller than the VF-2 and the magnification is 1.0 vs the 1.5 in the VF-2.
__________________
Olympus OMD-M5, HLG6 grip, Olympus 4/3rd 35mm macro lens, Panny/Leica 25mm, f1.4, Olympus 17mm, Canon Pro 9000 Mk II Printer, Canon MP990 Printer, Slik U212 Tripod, Manfrotto monopod, MMF3 converter.
James Emory is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old Dec 2, 2011, 12:33 PM   #2
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Dallas, Texas USA
Posts: 6,483
Default

Somewhat lower magnification on the negative side of the VF-3, but on the positive side it has a locking mechanism for more secure fitting it to the body.

I can see from just looking at the two the VF-3 has a squared eyepiece compared to the circular VF-2 opening. I only own the VF-2 and have not had a chance to personally see a VF-3 to know if the opening is the same size or not.

Regarding the locking mechanism of the VF-3, the VF-2 I have fits very securely in the shoe and is not going to just fall off, but I have seen some users complain about having lost VF-2's when they fell off when carrying the camera over their shoulder, especially when moving among crowds.

Last edited by Greg Chappell; Dec 2, 2011 at 2:41 PM.
Greg Chappell is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Dec 2, 2011, 1:02 PM   #3
Senior Member
 
James Emory's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Bay City, MI
Posts: 2,378
Default

Thank you.
__________________
Olympus OMD-M5, HLG6 grip, Olympus 4/3rd 35mm macro lens, Panny/Leica 25mm, f1.4, Olympus 17mm, Canon Pro 9000 Mk II Printer, Canon MP990 Printer, Slik U212 Tripod, Manfrotto monopod, MMF3 converter.
James Emory is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Dec 2, 2011, 2:22 PM   #4
Senior Member
 
boBBrennan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Arlington, Texas USA
Posts: 3,554
Default

I recently tried a VF-3, it is quite good. The eyepiece is rectangular but is equally the size of the VF-2 and very bright, the locking feature is certainly a plus, on the downside the VF-3 is available only in the silver color..... should one (me) like it in black then this is a negative. The diopter dial is large and convenient to rotate, it is located on a side of the VF-3.

The VF-3 is IMO totally adequate.... the physical size and shape fits nicely to the P3, it would be a great accessory to any of the PEN cameras.
_____________

I own and use a VF-2.........
__________________
.
boBBrennan .. FB=> http://tinyurl.com/dxlwxfz

.......he likes Olympus, Apple MAC & SmugMug best of the choices; he likes that he has choices

boBBrennan.smugmug.com

Last edited by boBBrennan; Dec 2, 2011 at 6:26 PM.
boBBrennan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Dec 2, 2011, 3:02 PM   #5
Senior Member
 
James Emory's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Bay City, MI
Posts: 2,378
Default

Thanks Bob, that's the one I'll get. It will save me a few bucks over the VF-2.
__________________
Olympus OMD-M5, HLG6 grip, Olympus 4/3rd 35mm macro lens, Panny/Leica 25mm, f1.4, Olympus 17mm, Canon Pro 9000 Mk II Printer, Canon MP990 Printer, Slik U212 Tripod, Manfrotto monopod, MMF3 converter.
James Emory is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Dec 2, 2011, 4:34 PM   #6
Senior Member
 
Biro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 835
Default

James... while I agree the VF-3 is entirely adequate, technically it features lower resolution than the VF-2. The VF-3 has something on the order of 920,000 dots versus the 1.4 or 1.5 million dots of the VF-2. This is noticeable but certainly no deal-killer. The VF-3 is several orders of magnitude better than the optional, external EVF offered by Panasonic for the GF1. I have the VF-2 but if I could only have the VF-3, there'd be no problem. But, personally, I think the VF-3 should be a few more dollars less expensive than it currently is. Right now, there's about $40 difference between the two (street prices).
Biro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Dec 2, 2011, 4:56 PM   #7
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Dallas, Texas USA
Posts: 6,483
Default

The last time I checked, the dog-of-an electronic finder Panasonic offers for GF-1, GF-2 and GF-3 users (LVF-1) is $146. B&H has the black VF-2 at $215, which is quite a bit less than what I paid when it first came out. I think it was something like $279.

At $180, the VF-3 is around $100 less than the VF-2 was when brand-new, so that price is probably about right since it's still a pretty new product. I would imagine over time it may drop in price in somewhat in the same manner as the VF-2 has, but the VF-2 has been available for quite a bit of time now. Based on what Panasonic charges for their very low resolution LVF-1, and it has never dropped in price, the VF-3 is a bargain.
Greg Chappell is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Dec 2, 2011, 7:32 PM   #8
Senior Member
 
folob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Edmonton, Alberta
Posts: 855
Default

I just got the VF-3 ... Stay tunes for my review.
__________________
Portfolio: http://agilephotography.deviantart.com/

Gears: OM-D E-M5 Mark II and E-M1 MK 1 with 14-150mm Mark II, 12-40mm f2.8, 15mm f8 cap lens, 60mm Macro, 75-300mm, Olympus Trinity -> 25/45/75mm f1.8. On the 4/3 side: 9-18mm and 50-200SWD with the MMF-2 4/3 adapter, FL-36R and FL-50. Also Rokinon mFT 7.5mm f3.5 Fisheye, Pentax 50mm f1.7 with K to m4/3 adapter, Olympus OM 200mm with OM to m4/3 adapter.
folob is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Dec 2, 2011, 9:50 PM   #9
Senior Member
 
shoturtle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Frankfurt AM
Posts: 11,348
Default

They are both good EVF. But for the extra mag and res, makes it work a little better for MF lens users especially for Macro. But next to that when every I play with the VF-3. It was worked just was well as my VF-2 with AF lenses. I like the larger slightly larger eye piece of the VF-2. That is just personal preference as someone who shoots with glasses.
__________________
Super Frequent Flyer, no joke. Ex Patriot and loving it.
Canon Eos 60D, T1i/500D, Eos1, Eos 630, Olympus EPL-1, and a part time Pentax K-X shooter.
shoturtle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Dec 3, 2011, 9:58 AM   #10
Senior Member
 
James Emory's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Bay City, MI
Posts: 2,378
Default

Now you got me thinking...maybe the VF-2 would be a better choice for 40 bucks more especially since I have a black PL-2 and the VF-3 only comes in silver.
__________________
Olympus OMD-M5, HLG6 grip, Olympus 4/3rd 35mm macro lens, Panny/Leica 25mm, f1.4, Olympus 17mm, Canon Pro 9000 Mk II Printer, Canon MP990 Printer, Slik U212 Tripod, Manfrotto monopod, MMF3 converter.
James Emory is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 2:04 PM.