Go Back   Steve's Digicams Forums > Digital SLR and Interchangeable Lens Cameras > Olympus Micro Four Thirds

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old Feb 9, 2014, 11:45 AM   #11
Senior Member
 
MarceloLI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Long Island - New York
Posts: 2,102
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by James Emory View Post
I like the versatility of the zooms over the primes and the 14-54mm is my walk around lens. I would some day like to own the 9-18mm Oly.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Steven R View Post
I pretty much stopped using primes when I converted from 35mm film to digital. Now, between my 12-60mm and 50-200mm, 99% of what I need is covered.
Thank you James and Steven, I like zooms also but I need some speed for low light situations and only the primes can do that.
MarceloLI is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Feb 9, 2014, 12:09 PM   #12
Senior Member
 
MarceloLI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Long Island - New York
Posts: 2,102
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Greg Chappell View Post
I couldn't decide, so just bought them all (literally). The list of what I don't would be shorter.

Favorite- 12mm f2. Coverage, speed and size, it's a wonderful lens.
#2- Panasonic 25mm f1.4
#3- 75mm f1.8

With the E-M1 and introduction of the 12-40mm f2.8 I'm using the primes less than before, although I do still often carry the 75/1.8 with the 12-40....makes a nice two lens outfit.

Olympus knew what they were doing. Back when I was buying the primes, the only Zuiko zoom options were slow and now, with the new 12-40 and soon-to-be-out 40-150mm f2.8, I'm sure I'm not the only one migrating to the zooms and using the primes less.
That is the set configuration I was thinking but the 12-40mm is very tempting but the bokeh from the primes is very interesting.

Thank you for the info Greg.
MarceloLI is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Feb 9, 2014, 12:17 PM   #13
Senior Member
 
MarceloLI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Long Island - New York
Posts: 2,102
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by chiPersei View Post
Of the three I own this one's easy. Between the Panasonic Leica 45mm f2.8, Panasonic Lumix G Leica Summilux 25mm f1.4 and the Lumix G 20mm f1.7, the 20mm f1.7 is my go-to lens.

The 45 may be a great portrait lens but I don't do much portrait shooting. It's also a noted macro but I feel the 20 (for me anyway) works fine for close-ups. When using the 45 for a macro I find it's DOF is overly narrow (for any given aperture) and often miss my focal point in the split second between auto focus and shutter release. Perhaps if I used it more I'd remember to stop down the aperture more than I normally would. And yes, if you're hauling a tripod it's not necessarily an issue but I don't always want to do that. I'm more of a shoot and run photog over the person who takes a long time staging. A.D.D. I suppose. There's always adjusting DOF after viewing a test image but "oh look at that other pretty flower".

The 20 is small, light and fast. Can't argue with that. Second the additional 5mm over the 25 makes it more versatile without adding much distortion that can come with wider lenses. Bonus, it's plenty sharp.

Since getting the M1 and shortly thereafter the Zuiko 12-40 I've been spending more time with the 12-40. But the 20 will always be with me. I did mention it's small and light.

Thank you so much for the info and the pictures, you and Greg are convincing me to go with the 12-40mm.
MarceloLI is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Feb 9, 2014, 12:21 PM   #14
Senior Member
 
MarceloLI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Long Island - New York
Posts: 2,102
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Shutterbug74 View Post
I just recently traded in my Canon 60D and lenses (15-85, 60mm macro and 50 1.4) for the Olympus system. I've heard rave reviews for the last 2-3 years and had a chance to get a new E-PL5 for 300....so I figured for that I'd try it out and if I didn't like it, I could re-sell the camera and not be out of pocket. Well, I was hooked. They are fantastic systems and I've enjoyed it so much that I'm eyeing the E-M5 for later in the year I still have my 5D3 and "L" lenses but I'm keeping those for professional shooting and changing to the Olympus for my carry round. The 60D and lenses, while excellent, simply weren't being used at all. Aside from the price, I also selected the E-PL5 because I wanted something very different from a DSLR looking camera for venue shooting. We are going to a concert soon at the Air Canada Centre in Toronto and they prohibit DSLR type cameras for certain events. This way, with the E-PL5 I won't get hassled for bringing it.

I bought Olympus (Panasonic is good too) because it has in body stabilization and can utilize Panny lenses while maintaing stabilization. Panasonic has the stabilization built into the lenses. My Aunt has a Sony MFT and while nice, Panasonic and Olympus offer a wider variety of lens selection.

My choice of lenses was the Olympus 45mm 1.8 and I'm totally in love with its capabilities. The Olympus 60mm 2.8 macro which doubles as my mini telephoto (I've heard the 75mm 1.8 is top notch but so is the 800 Canadian price tag + 13% tax). Lastly, I bought the Panasonic 25 1.4 which I will get soon as its on order. I selected this one because of the reviews and my affinity for the 50mm focal length it provides (loved my EF 50 1.4 and am in love with my 50 1.2). Lastly, I'd decide between the 12mm, Oly 17 1.8 or the 12-40.....After I decide on one of these my kit is totally complete.

Hope that helps
Thank you so much, I saw a few days ago some people shots with the 45mm 1.8 and 75mm 1.8 and the results are fantastic.

I have some primes with my Nikon set up but for some walks I do in the city is too big and heavy.

Thank you again for your reply.

Marcelo
MarceloLI is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Feb 9, 2014, 12:51 PM   #15
Senior Member
 
MarceloLI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Long Island - New York
Posts: 2,102
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Biro View Post
I have quite a bit of micro four-thirds glass but the only fast lenses I have are primes. My zooms are pedestrian in terms of aperture but still quite useful outdoors.

For a long time, the Panasonic 20mm f1.7 was my go-to lens and it still is on Panasonic bodies. But this lens can result in banding at high ISOs on Olympus bodies with the 16mp Sony sensor. So I picked up the Oly 17mm f/1.8 and it's used a lot on my E-PM2. Also used a lot on that same camera is my Panasonic 14mm f/2.5 - a steal of a lens if there ever was one.

50mm is just a bit tighter than I typically like, so I never picked up the PanaLeica 25mm f/1.4 but many people will tell you this is the micro four-thirds prime to save. But don't buy before checking out Oly's new 25mm f/1.8.

Also, for portraits, I have the Olympus 45mm f/1.8. This is a great piece of glass even if the lens barrel is plastic.
Than you so much for your feedback, the 45mm 1.8 is a lens that I would like to try, the pictures from it are very sharp and great DOF.
MarceloLI is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Feb 9, 2014, 1:13 PM   #16
Senior Member
 
MarceloLI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Long Island - New York
Posts: 2,102
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ramcewan View Post
I've shot the Lumix 14mm f2.5, Sigma 19mm f2.8, Olympus Zuiko 25mm f2.8, and the Olympus M. Zuiko 45mm f1.8.

Of those I would say the one that has yielded the most shots I like for me is actually the Lumix 14mm f2.5. I really love the 45mm f1.8 but it is a specialist lens that really requires you to think about the field of view you are shooting at. The Sigma 19mm f2.8 and Zuiko 25mm f2.8 both were supplanted by the 14-54mm zoom.

But the Lumix is a tiny little lens with a nice wide angle for landscapes, considering I bought mine on ebay for $175 it has been a steal. Here's some of my favorite shots with it;


Desert View Tower, Grand Canyon, AZ by ramcewan, on Flickr


Secret Canyon outside Page, AZ by ramcewan, on Flickr


sedona redrock from chapel of the holy cross 20120426 by ramcewan, on Flickr

closer to home


Beaver lake HDR by ramcewan, on Flickr


Foggy morning sunrise in the woods by ramcewan, on Flickr

it can even do cats


Kazoo on his level by ramcewan, on Flickr



The ease with which I can use the 14-54mm f2.8-3.5 in all but the worst light has made it an instant hit for me. I would likely only ditch it if I were to replace it with the 12-40mm f2.8.

I also find myself wanting the 9-18mm... not sure which version to go for though, the MFT version seems to take a hit on IQ and I've committed to carrying around the FT->MFT adapter anyways...
Those are very sharp pictures, thank you so much for posting and thank you for the info.

I am using my m4/3 system more often and I think I will need to buy at least one prime and the 12-40mm 2.8

Thank you everyone, I'll let you know my decision soon.

Marcelo
MarceloLI is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Feb 9, 2014, 1:24 PM   #17
Senior Member
 
chiPersei's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 931
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ramcewan View Post
I've shot the Lumix 14mm f2.5, Sigma 19mm f2.8, Olympus Zuiko 25mm f2.8, and the Olympus M. Zuiko 45mm f1.8.

Of those I would say the one that has yielded the most shots I like for me is actually the Lumix 14mm f2.5.

But the Lumix is a tiny little lens with a nice wide angle for landscapes, considering I bought mine on ebay for $175 it has been a steal. Here's some of my favorite shots with it;
Wow! I know this isn't a photo critiquing thread but your example images are making me give serious thought to the 14mm. And taking a vacation.
chiPersei is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Feb 10, 2014, 11:35 AM   #18
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 358
Default

ramcewan, those were great photos and highlight how good the M4/3rd's have gotten. Well done and totally jealous of the scenery!!!
__________________
Olympus E-PL5 45mm 1.8, 60mm macro and Panny 25mm 1.4

Canon 5D III
50mm 1.2 L l 24-70 F2.8 L l 70-200 F4 L l 40mm 2.8 l 100mmL 2.8 macro

http://www.facebook.com/pages/Alainn...39490172728282
http://alainnbellephotography.smugmug.com/
Shutterbug74 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Feb 10, 2014, 2:10 PM   #19
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Beaver, PA
Posts: 903
Default

Excellent of course Ramcewan. I had a question for you though since we're running the same combination--do you get a lot of purple/magenta flare around light sources with the 14mm?
SammyKhalifa is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Feb 10, 2014, 2:56 PM   #20
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: New England, USA
Posts: 2,069
Default

hey guys thanks! I appreciate the feedback, but I can't take credit for the scenery only my luck of catching it right!

SammyKhalifa - yes the 14mm will show purple fringing around areas of high contrast such as tree branches against a sky. Not much you can do about it except be aware and try to avoid situations which make it more noticeable. Even the 14-54mm shows CA at the wide end. I think working with lightroom it is lessened as is it in post processing software that has the profile corrections for this lens built in.
__________________
in my bag: e-m1, 7-14mm pro, 14-54mm mk ii, 50-200mm mk i, 70-300mm
in my pocket: e-pm2 lumix 12-32
ramcewan is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 6:22 PM.