Go Back   Steve's Digicams Forums > Digital SLR and Interchangeable Lens Cameras > Olympus Micro Four Thirds

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old Jan 9, 2016, 3:19 PM   #1
Senior Member
 
James Emory's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Bay City, MI
Posts: 2,380
Default Olympus 12-50mm EZ lens

Well the more I am trying to decide which way to go the more frustrating the experience. Of course gobs of money could settle the issue quite fast.

After doing a lot of reading and getting feedback from the members, I thought about going with the 25, f1.8 Oly lens as a walk around lens and then some time later getting the 12mm and the 45mm. I could end this quickly by getting the 12-50mm Oly and be done with it and also have a nice macro to boot. The 12-50 also has weather proofing which is complimentary to my OMD-M5.

The downside is that I'm sure sharpness, contrast and IQ are going to be better with the three primes I mentioned above. Where I need input is; am I going to be able to see the difference in IQ in photos up to 10x12; is it worth the expense of buying all three primes versus the more versatile but slower 12-50mm? Guys/gals, help me make my decision.
__________________
Olympus OMD-M5, HLG6 grip, Olympus 4/3rd 35mm macro lens, Panny/Leica 25mm, f1.4, Olympus 17mm, Canon Pro 9000 Mk II Printer, Canon MP990 Printer, Slik U212 Tripod, Manfrotto monopod, MMF3 converter.
James Emory is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old Jan 9, 2016, 5:49 PM   #2
Senior Member
 
MarceloLI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Long Island - New York
Posts: 2,099
Default

James,

Im not sure what is your stile of photography and what is your budget for the new lenses.

I had the 12-50mm and I like it, it is not sharp as the primes but is a versatile lens and the weather sealing is a nice feature.





If you are planning to take pictures in hard weather conditions the 12-50mm is a great choice, if you are looking for sharpness, faster aperture and better IQ the primes are the way to go.

The 12,, f2 is a sweet lens, if you are planning to do some landscapes, cityscapes pictures this is a great lens,




If you are more on people portraits or street photography the 45mm 1.8 is the right lens for it.




I don't have the Oly 25mm 1.8 so I can't comment about the IQ this lens deliver.

Good luck with your search and let us know if you have more questions.

Marcelo
MarceloLI is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jan 10, 2016, 2:24 PM   #3
Senior Member
 
James Emory's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Bay City, MI
Posts: 2,380
Default

Thanks for the photographic input Marcello. Money is not really the issue, it's just that I do not want to buy something I really do not require. I'm sure that I do not take the amount of photos that you and many other members of this forum take so I ask myself, would the PRO 12-40mm be a good investment for the amount of photography I do; probably not. But when I do go to an event or place, I do want sharpness, nice contrast and good color. So I am thinking that I could probably find nice used copies of the three primes I mentioned for a cost that would likely be below what the PRO 12-40 would cost. Of course the primes would not be weather sealed but I am not one to take photos in the rain or expose my lenses to rain should it start raining. I may take another few days to decide but I'm leaning toward starting with the Oly 25mm prime which should be a good walk around lens and have good sharpness, contrast and color. My next move would be the 45mm prime which I feel would get more use than the 12mm which would be the last prime lens I would get. I would likely buy the 70-300 Oly before I bought the 12mm. Sometimes I think I must be driving everyone here crazy.
__________________
Olympus OMD-M5, HLG6 grip, Olympus 4/3rd 35mm macro lens, Panny/Leica 25mm, f1.4, Olympus 17mm, Canon Pro 9000 Mk II Printer, Canon MP990 Printer, Slik U212 Tripod, Manfrotto monopod, MMF3 converter.
James Emory is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jan 11, 2016, 4:40 PM   #4
Senior Member
 
folob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Edmonton, Alberta
Posts: 856
Default

James,

A couple of things: If you get the 12-40 ... then you do not really need the 12, 25 or even the 45mm ... unless you want really fast lens (f1.8 instead of f2.8).

Since I got the 12-40 ... my 25 and 45mm are staying on the basement more often than not. As for the 75-300 (not the 70-300). It is not bad at all and cheap!

Cost for new ($USD): 12-40 f2.8 new is ~$800 ... and the 25mm is ~$300 (the same for the 45mm). So, a bit of a cost saving having the 25/45mm combo ... but maybe not as useful than the 12-40 (if you have not concern about the weight of the 12-40).

Alternative: The 14-150 mark II ????

Gilles
__________________
Portfolio: http://agilephotography.deviantart.com/

Gears: OM-D E-M5 Mark II and E-M1 MK 1 with 14-150mm Mark II, 12-40mm f2.8, 15mm f8 cap lens, 60mm Macro, 75-300mm, Olympus Trinity -> 25/45/75mm f1.8. On the 4/3 side: 9-18mm and 50-200SWD with the MMF-2 4/3 adapter, FL-36R and FL-50. Also Rokinon mFT 7.5mm f3.5 Fisheye, Pentax 50mm f1.7 with K to m4/3 adapter, Olympus OM 200mm with OM to m4/3 adapter.
folob is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jan 11, 2016, 6:58 PM   #5
Senior Member
 
James Emory's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Bay City, MI
Posts: 2,380
Default

Thanks Gilles. Never thought of the 14-150. When released it sold for 600.00 and now can be had for 400.00. Just finished reading reviews on this by users and not photo critics and it appears to be a sharper lens than the 12-50. The 14-150 is seriously worth considering.
__________________
Olympus OMD-M5, HLG6 grip, Olympus 4/3rd 35mm macro lens, Panny/Leica 25mm, f1.4, Olympus 17mm, Canon Pro 9000 Mk II Printer, Canon MP990 Printer, Slik U212 Tripod, Manfrotto monopod, MMF3 converter.
James Emory is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jan 11, 2016, 9:12 PM   #6
Senior Member
 
MarceloLI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Long Island - New York
Posts: 2,099
Default

The 14-150mm MKII is a very nice lens.

I used it in my last trip and i like it, nice focal length and weather sealed.

MarceloLI is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jan 11, 2016, 9:13 PM   #7
Senior Member
 
MarceloLI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Long Island - New York
Posts: 2,099
Default

MarceloLI is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jan 12, 2016, 9:52 AM   #8
Senior Member
 
folob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Edmonton, Alberta
Posts: 856
Default

Even if the 14-150mm MKII is slower than the 12-50 (not that much), it became my travel lens because if its weight and its range. The 12-40 is still way better but I keep it closer to home

Note: Example of Travel Kit -> 14-150 Mark II, Rokinon 7.5mm fisheye and (based on where I go) the 4/3 9-18 or the 75-300
__________________
Portfolio: http://agilephotography.deviantart.com/

Gears: OM-D E-M5 Mark II and E-M1 MK 1 with 14-150mm Mark II, 12-40mm f2.8, 15mm f8 cap lens, 60mm Macro, 75-300mm, Olympus Trinity -> 25/45/75mm f1.8. On the 4/3 side: 9-18mm and 50-200SWD with the MMF-2 4/3 adapter, FL-36R and FL-50. Also Rokinon mFT 7.5mm f3.5 Fisheye, Pentax 50mm f1.7 with K to m4/3 adapter, Olympus OM 200mm with OM to m4/3 adapter.
folob is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jan 18, 2016, 1:19 PM   #9
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Dallas, Texas USA
Posts: 6,519
Default

After using every possible iteration of lens combinations, the 12-40mm f2.8 for me is the best combination of speed, versatility and image quality. You get the optical quality of the primes and the versatility of the zoom.

The most important issue after that is, finding what works best to carry your outfit comfortably, with the needed space and the "Pro" zooms definitely impose the need of finding a comfortable bag. Just the 12-40 or it and the 40-150 still work fine with a shoulder bag. Adding the 7-14, I moved to a Think Tank sling bag that distributes the weight more evenly, making the outfit very comfortable to carry, and keeps a lower profile.
Greg Chappell is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jan 18, 2016, 2:06 PM   #10
Senior Member
 
James Emory's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Bay City, MI
Posts: 2,380
Default

Yes Gregg, that would be a great lens to have and I am seriously thinking about doing that down the road. Right now I have a great prime in the Panny/Leica 25mm, f1.4 that should serve me very well for the time being. I also have the 35mm macro and a MMF3 adaptor that will take care of any close up work. I will need a telephoto zoom and I think the Oly 75-300 would be a good lens for me without having to sell my house to get it. I saw the beautiful shots you took with it at the baseball park quite some time ago and I thought they looked very good in contrast and color but I'm sure you probably did some editing with those files.
__________________
Olympus OMD-M5, HLG6 grip, Olympus 4/3rd 35mm macro lens, Panny/Leica 25mm, f1.4, Olympus 17mm, Canon Pro 9000 Mk II Printer, Canon MP990 Printer, Slik U212 Tripod, Manfrotto monopod, MMF3 converter.
James Emory is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 7:58 PM.