Go Back   Steve's Digicams Forums > Digital SLR and Interchangeable Lens Cameras > Olympus Micro Four Thirds

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old May 11, 2017, 8:47 PM   #1
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Dallas, Texas USA
Posts: 6,492
Default E-M1 Mark II at White Sands National Monument

I've made a couple of passes through the 900+ image files, processed and loaded what I consider the best 138 images here..


I could load 300-400 images, I will load a few others over the next several days, but after a while most of them will start looking the same to be honest. When you start looking at files like these, the ones that jump out are the unique shadow/details vs. dune "veins" images with little to no other unique shadow characteristics.

There's also no getting around just how good the 12-100mm f4 was. There were a couple of afternoons where I arrived to the dunes for an evening shoot and there was an active sand storm happening with 35-40 mile per hour winds blowing (mornings always start calm, with winds picking up a couple of hours or so after sunrise, then calmed down again a couple of hours or so prior to sunset), which can start to make you worried about switching lenses, even a system with the type dust-fighting features of the Olympus system. The 12-100 made that worry mute. 12mm is wide enough way more times than not, and 100mm was plenty long for the distances you were working at to isolate features or compress backgrounds.

I could have shot the vast majority of what I captured with the 12-40mm f2.8 M. Zuiko. The problem would be those every, maybe 15-20 shots where you need a 66mm lens, or an 80mm lens, or 100mm, which would have forced me to change to the 40-150 6-7 times, then having to change back to the 12-40, not to mention having to tote that 40-150mm f2.8 in the bag that was hung around my neck while I hiked the entire 3.5-4 miles over 2-3 hours each evening, so I'm figuring the 12-100 saved me at least 12-15 lens changes each day, not to mention the extra soreness from having carried the 40-150mm f2.8 all day to maybe use it for maybe 9-12 images.

And as far as I can see, using the 12-100mm f4 comes with no loss in optical quality compared to the 12-40 and 40-150mm f2.8's. It is optically superb. It's obviously a stop slower, but it also comes with that dual IS, which is just remarkable. The one weakness I can report are those situations where the sun is just a little bit outside the field of view, but close enough the rays can get around the hood and hit the front element at an oblique angle, creating a couple or so flare bubbles, some of which were easy to correct if they were in the sky, or more problematic if they fell in the sand field. I also at times, when I noticed it, was able to add some extra protecting with my left hand shading the sun.

The real surprise was when I decided to just start placing the sun in the direct field of view at times, which produced no real visible flare. Really surprising and quite different compared to a lens like, say the 7-14mm f2.8, which will flare if you just say the word "sun" while you are shooting with it.

You can click on any of the images below and the hyperlink will take you to the file on my web page and you can take them to 100% if you want to look at them closer. They were all captured raw and processed in DXO Optics Pro 11. Nothing else I have used currently can touch the colors, optical corrections or noise reduction capabilities of DXO.

Shooting directly into the sun..

Last edited by Greg Chappell; May 11, 2017 at 8:59 PM.
Greg Chappell is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old May 12, 2017, 9:27 AM   #2
Senior Member
folob's Avatar
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Edmonton, Alberta
Posts: 855

Love those shots !!!
Portfolio: http://agilephotography.deviantart.com/

Gears: OM-D E-M5 Mark II and E-M1 MK 1 with 14-150mm Mark II, 12-40mm f2.8, 15mm f8 cap lens, 60mm Macro, 75-300mm, Olympus Trinity -> 25/45/75mm f1.8. On the 4/3 side: 9-18mm and 50-200SWD with the MMF-2 4/3 adapter, FL-36R and FL-50. Also Rokinon mFT 7.5mm f3.5 Fisheye, Pentax 50mm f1.7 with K to m4/3 adapter, Olympus OM 200mm with OM to m4/3 adapter.
folob is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 12, 2017, 11:16 AM   #3
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Beaver, PA
Posts: 894

SammyKhalifa is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 13, 2017, 6:11 AM   #4
Senior Member
zig-123's Avatar
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Cape Cod, Massachusetts
Posts: 5,145

As always, your images want me to go and see first hand, the beauty of the areas that you've visited. Although, after looking at the 143 posted in your gallery, I'm tired and thirsty.

These images support your argument for using a zoom lens with a long focal range that minimizes changing lenses in the field.


So you want to be a better photographer? Open your eyes and take a look at what is all around you.
zig-123 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 13, 2017, 6:33 AM   #5
Senior Member
mike_1's Avatar
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Illinois, USA
Posts: 450

Beautiful shots! Now I want to go there.

mike_1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 14, 2017, 10:49 AM   #6
Senior Member
James Emory's Avatar
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Bay City, MI
Posts: 2,378

Enjoying viewing these shots very much. Very nice job. I like the depth that was created.
Olympus OMD-M5, HLG6 grip, Olympus 4/3rd 35mm macro lens, Panny/Leica 25mm, f1.4, Olympus 17mm, Canon Pro 9000 Mk II Printer, Canon MP990 Printer, Slik U212 Tripod, Manfrotto monopod, MMF3 converter.
James Emory is offline   Reply With Quote

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:51 PM.