Go Back   Steve's Digicams Forums > Digital Cameras (Point and Shoot) > Olympus

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old May 1, 2003, 9:49 AM   #1
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 52
Default Slower lens?

I know I could post this anywhere, but since I found somthing comparing 2 Oly cameras, I thought I would ask here.

This is some specs I got off a website comparing the D-550 and the D-560 and I am unsure of what it means. I can't seem to find a good website either that talks in my lanuage describing what it means, all I know is it said the lens is slower, can anybody give me a clue what this means and how does this affect a camera? (550 = f/2.9-4.4, 560= f/3.1-5.2). Does slower lense affect picture quality?

Also, another odd question that may be very obvious, does a bigger lens mean better quality of a picture? Comparing like a C-4000 and a D series Olympus camera, does a bigger lens play an important part in the quality of picture?
-Dave
djkothbauer is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old May 1, 2003, 12:16 PM   #2
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 95
Default

Slower lens will certainly limit you to low light exposure options. With a slower lens, you may have a hard time getting the right exposure for low light photos, such as in night time photos.
gmlasam is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 1, 2003, 12:46 PM   #3
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,050
Default

Quote:
can anybody give me a clue what this means and how does this affect a camera? (550 = f/2.9-4.4, 560= f/3.1-5.2). Does slower lense affect picture quality?
A fast lens does the 100 in sub 10 secs..... :lol:

A fast lens lets more light in than a slow lens. A fast lens would be F2.8 min, a very fast lens F2 or better.


Quote:
does a bigger lens mean better quality of a picture?
Not necessarilly, a fast lens could also be rubbish and a slow lens extremely good.

It is however unusual to find a fast lens which is of really poor quality as they are normally reserved for expensive quality cameras.

Quote:
550 = f/2.9-4.4, 560= f/3.1-5.2).
F2.9 Vs F3.1 is of no real significance, in fact both are reasonbly fast lenses but both have very limited F ranges. My concern here would be the F4.4 and F5.2 which would restrict the Depth of Field.
steve6 is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 4:24 PM.