|
![]() |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
![]() |
#1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 2,703
|
![]()
I decided to give the FZ50 a try since I no do not have the FZ30. After using the camera for awhile I find I do agree with Jim in that if I still had the FZ30 I can see no reason to upgrade to the FZ50. But, I have found nothing that would convince me to dump the FZ50 and buy a FZ30. Here are a few shots with the 50, the first two were taken using a TCON-17 and the last shot was taken using an OLY C-210. You can see more shots and read the exif here
http://s109.photobucket.com/albums/n...Z50/?start=all ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Sponsored Links |
|
![]() |
#2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,932
|
![]()
tcook,
They are beautiful! I am a newbie, but I can't tell the difference between your shots and dslr. I have a fz7, could I use the same gear you mentioned you used for closer shots? Donna |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 2,703
|
![]()
Thanks D.Annfor the nice complement. You can use the gear I mentioned on a FZ7 although I am not sure if any modifications are required or if they can attach directly. I know some forum members have used them on their FZ5 so perhaps they could let you know what is required.
D.Ann wrote: Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 1,613
|
![]()
WOW!!! those are super bird shots!!!! luv them...
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Rockingham Western Australia
Posts: 592
|
![]()
That is a plus for the FZ50...Fred
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 100
|
![]()
Wow, Thank you very much. I was debating whether to buy one of these or not. Your photos have just about decided me to order one tonight!
Other than the finging and noise around the high contrast areas, this looks like a great all around camera.! |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 109
|
![]()
Nice shots especially the last picture
Will try out my FZ50 on this topic (birds) but still doubt i will have the patience to wait and seek out the opportunity. Our weather here ( SE Asia) is rather hot and humid all year round |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Abilene. TX
Posts: 1,486
|
![]()
Nice shots Tcook. Numder 3 is my favorite, really nice and detailed.
Don |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 2,131
|
![]()
great shots no.3 really rocks
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,813
|
![]()
Very nice pics.
My only concern is for pics like the one below, where NR seems to have destroyed any detail in the plumage (at ISO 100)... It's real that even LOW (?) NR setting is a too high one and I fear I know how these must look seen at full 100% crop. This is a great fault in FZ50 (IMO) for shooting only RAW is a madness (for those like me who can even take 300-400 pics in a day). Also Noise Ninja, Neatimage and other Photoshop plugins are not perfect (I often apply them only to parts of the image, for they destroy fine textures too), let's think about in-camera-NR (which makes it all in a fraction of a second...) This is the only blunder (CON) of this FZ50 IMO, but sadly it's an outstanding one. ![]() PS smearing of fine detail was already a feature I noted in FZ30 pics, but when resized I can still could see the great resolution improvement over the 5Mp FZs. While this FZ50 (by which I am still tempted) seemstoo much spolied by high NR algorithm. When the pics is noisy but detailed, you can eliminate the noise in the relative areas. When it is deprived of details by high NR, you cannot restore details anymore. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|