|
![]() |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
![]() |
#41 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,504
|
![]()
ttkbear wrote:
Quote:
In this case, I prefer the looks of the picture without the filter, but the polarizer certainly did its job of cutting the reflection to where you can see the bottom of the lake. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#42 |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 84
|
![]()
Wow. Big difference. This is what I remember the CP did on my 35mm SLR. I'm just not seeing the same with new filter/new camera.
I must be doing something wrong. Even tried the water shots and whilest it's better it's not that good. Thanks ttkbear for the great examples. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#43 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,504
|
![]()
Grant2 wrote:
Quote:
Are you adjusting it properly? The axis has to be lined up exactly according to the influx of light in order to achieve the desired effect. In some cases there will be no visible difference, in others (situations with a lot of light from the side and reflections and glare) it can be dramatic. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#44 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 22
|
![]()
rduve, you're correct. As I spin the filter the effects change dramtically and depending on the direction of the light source and it's relative position to the object, there may not be any change at all when using the filter.
Are the effects of a linear filter the same? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#45 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 490
|
![]()
Linear results should be essentially the same. Keep in mind that one can put marks on the polarizer ring to indicate when its at full effect and one where its at minimum effect. Saves a lot of time adjusting when photo op is passing.
One can use polarized sunglasses at right angle to confirm when at max effect (no light passing...) Use a dot of clear nail polish at either extreme on the rotating ring and lens base. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#46 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,504
|
![]()
Telecorder wrote:
Quote:
Most polarizer have a little notch for that purpose. You align it with the angle of the sun to get the full effect. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#47 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 490
|
![]()
rduve wrote:
Quote:
If I understand your comments correct, one just 'dials' the mark to orient it to the sun'selevation and you're at max polarization effect? And then rotate either way away from that point until the desired effect is reached? Thanks, Rduve! |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#48 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,504
|
![]()
Telecorder: You got it!
:-) |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#49 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 24
|
![]()
About the first 4 pictures of this thread:
I like the skies without the polarizer more natural the with it. I's expected more. I was thinking of buying a polarizer for landscape pictures to avoi those blown out skies, but i'm not sure now if it does the job . The leafes are nice though |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#50 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 22
|
![]()
I think, in these images, the effect to the sky is due the angle the picture was taken. In my limited experience, when I use a polarizing filterfor landscape shots, the sky becomes a deeper blue and can make some colors standout at little more. In most cases, I like the effects of polarizering filtersbut it's all personal choice. Experiment and see for yourself.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|