|
![]() |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
![]() |
#21 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 191
|
![]()
My own opinion is that Lense 1 is sharper and therefore logically that is the Olympus?? :?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#22 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,255
|
![]()
Seedubs wrote:
Quote:
So I had to adjust my equipment again. - I used auto focus with this first test. I fixed the focus and the results were exactly the same for both lenses! So let's proudly present the Mcon 16 with full zoom power: 2-12x. Sven |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#23 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,288
|
![]()
A good strong light source is the most important item in Macro work.
FZ10 CRing adapter 62-52mm Cring Nikon 4T ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#24 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,255
|
![]()
thanks LoveLife,
you could help use with a professional mounting of these lenses. This is stacking: (picture can be enlarged) ![]() You see some corner softness now. Lenses above +4 diopter should not be stacked. There is a big gap between the two lenses. A closer setup would improve the results. But I have a fantastic lens with +11 diopters - the MBS-10 - so I don't need this combination. Sven This stops the corner softness while stacking - a different setup. I could not believe it, but the thread of the front lens is ??? right! 55mm x 0.75 - direct fit. Vignetting at 1.5x zoom. It is safer to use an "empty" filter in between. ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#25 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,813
|
![]()
Thanks for presenting us thje results of your experiments, Sven
you're the achromats' alchemist |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|