Go Back   Steve's Digicams Forums >

LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old Mar 15, 2006, 3:06 AM   #11
Yogibear's Avatar
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 76

And the best of all:when you take a close look at the corresponding (best quality) JPG- and TIFF files (I did), you will see ABSOLUTELY no difference!!! The same 'staircase' pixels, the same sharpness (or fuzziness), the same colours. I wonder why Panasonic has given usthe TIFF option....

Below: original (TIFF) photo, then a center crop of the JPG-Image and then a center crop of the TIFF image (please forgive me the slight difference in size of the crops, but it doesn't change my point).

Original TIFF:

Center crop of the JPG-image:

Center crop of the TIFF-image:


Yogibear is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 15, 2006, 6:43 AM   #12
Senior Member
genece's Avatar
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 2,111

I agree tiff is worthless, but its one area that Panasonic listened to use we asked for tiff when we had the FZ10, and they gave it to us.... when we discovered it had no value ...we asked for raw and they gave us that.
genece is offline   Reply With Quote

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 5:54 AM.