|
![]() |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
![]() |
#21 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,724
|
![]()
Gasp....! The pics I posted were 800x600, shot using the full 8 mp setting. I posted them to show what you can expect from the FZ 30, in normal situations, with low light, where you can expect noise if there's going to be any. At full screen resolution they look much better. N A T U R A L L Y they will be grainy and gross looking at 45 inches. But, at 11x81/2 prints, they look great. Even at the 17 inch size they look good. Don't judge a camera by pushing it's limits to something absurd. Judge it by the standards at which you want to see a good picture presented. What you see in my post is a fair indication of what you will get with your own FZ 30, only yours will be nicer by virtue of the fact mine were reduced in resolution to allow the post. Any digital camera's pics can be made to look grainy and noisy if you push the pixels far enough apart...go with the realistic sizes, judge by that. Best regards,
KennethD |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#22 |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 31
|
![]()
"And I do not buy into this wierd Idea that underexposing a shot(which promotes noise) can then be altered to achieve a good result, take the photo correctly in the first place."
i told you its a way to use 1600 while the camera does not offer it if you cant understand it its not my fault of course this is done in raw only ITS A WAY TO USE ASA WHICH IS NOT OFFERED BY YOUR CAM ITS THE BEAUTY OF RAW i never said that i dont like panasonic i told that ALL 8 megapixel cameras with small sensor have high noise but it can be reduced with noise reduction programs especially if you use raw so as not to loose much detail i still believe that if you just want to fit your images to your screen you should buy something muuch cheaper an fz20 would be enough even something cheaper, any long zoom camera is enough to just view your photos on your screen you dont need 8megapixel to just view them at 1024x768 which is 0,78 Mpixel!!! |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#23 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,724
|
![]()
akaloith wrote:
Quote:
KennethD |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#24 |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 31
|
![]()
congratulations for your 1000 post
![]() ok then if you need an equivalent 1000mm lens then the 420mm of fz30 and the crop from the 8mp image will give you what you want as i remember you get an equivalent of 700mm lens at 3mp so its nice but as you say few people need 8 million pixels also few people need the 1000mm equivalent lens its a great camera in any case i used to love the fuji s9500 but when i saw the clarity of the shots panasonic has, which is because of the terrific lens i decided to dump the fuji one will someone be kind enough to upload somewhere a 400 iso file in two versions a raw one and a jpeg one??? please?? of course with the same settings want to do some tests and share the results with you but i dont have the camera (not yet i hope) and to be greedy i would ask the same raw file shot with exposure compensation -1 and -2 but for the begining just the comparison between raw and jpeg at 400 asa would be enough |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#25 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 662
|
![]()
Hey Kenneth!, I do have some ISO pics somewhere, but I saw your Halloween pic, and thought I would share (sharing is caring----awwwwh!), my nieces, I took them out to one of the richer neighborhoods in Queens - the pumpkin you see is real:
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#26 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 2,111
|
![]() Quote:
And I believe I have the option to use what I wish and I will do so. And they print wonderfully with no noise evident what more do you want? And the best I know thats all you can do with a photo view it or print it. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|