|
![]() |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
![]() |
#1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 724
|
![]()
I actually took this when the colors were first changing here. I forgot all about it.
[align=center] ![]() [/align] |
![]() |
![]() |
Sponsored Links |
|
![]() |
#2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 724
|
![]()
[align=center]I am finding things I never edited. Here is a Sac Spider on a grass.
[align=center] ![]() [/align][/align] |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,932
|
![]()
BethEllen,
Both are great...but #2 is my favorite. Pin sharp and beautiful! Donna |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 724
|
![]()
Thanks Donna...it is fun going through folders and seeing what I missed. lol There is mostly junk tho. :G
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Abilene. TX
Posts: 1,486
|
![]()
Number 2 is supper shot.
Don |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,813
|
![]()
You are posting great stuff, Beth.
DCR 150 (+4) is nearly as magnification as I obtain with Nikon 5T and 6T (+ 4,4). Its power ends just where DCR 250's vignetting stops. For small bugs/spiders macros DCR250 is great, being more useable than the +20 reversed 50mm WA., and double power than 150. But I am sure I ll continue to use the 5T+6T as you ll do with DCR150: especially your second photo here is an example that more magnification is by no means = to a better photo. Without the whole millet (?) ear, the photo wouldn't have been as effective, although with a more detailed spider ... Narmer |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 724
|
![]()
Thanks Don!
Narmer, I have acquired a 4t and a 6T at a good price. I wasn't expecting to get the 6T and am thinking I should keep that one in case of upgrade. I adapted my FZ5 to 52mm and can use the 4T with ease. I am looking forward to exploring those when I get them. I will try to search for a good price on a 5T. The spider was taken at night and I think my lighting could have been better to improve the shot. I use a flashlight to focus and then made a small softbox to cover my onboard flash. Probably not the best setup. I do have an external flash now and hope to work with that more. Thanks for the comments. I am eager to continue improving my macro shots. ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Antwerp - Belgium
Posts: 3,454
|
![]()
a nice shot and one realy great one, the spider's composition is more the great - Ronny
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 214
|
![]()
Yup, No.1 is O.K., but No.2 is great-I like the extreme vivid colours (I´m normally not for the subtle things, anyway).
Cheers, RealMash |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Chama, New Mexico
Posts: 6,206
|
![]()
I like them both but #2 I think is the best
TOTALLY WACKY roger FZ 30, Nikon TCE17, QuikAim Max RDS, Zeiss Digiscope/Sony W7 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|