|
![]() |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
![]() |
#1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: South Africa
Posts: 245
|
![]()
I bit off topic: I see this caused quite a stir in the media ...... but a must read for anyone
in this forum who is considering a DSLR vs a Lumix Micro 4/3 camera http://www.stuckincustoms.com/2012/0...re-the-future/ Last edited by dbnnet; Jan 13, 2012 at 11:27 AM. |
![]() |
![]() |
Sponsored Links |
|
![]() |
#2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Bangor,North Wales
Posts: 3,766
|
![]()
Interesting article- though a DSLR still has a number of advantages over a compact/mirrorless camera. They can(arguably) take more abuse,having a more robust construction- in part,due to simply having more room to insert your electronics,potentially yielding more protection. They also handle far better- being heavier seems to reduce natural handshake. They also have a far better layout with regards functionality- with access to most common adjustments merely one button and a dial away(beats trolling through menu's). Also there is ROOM for these buttons on the larger DSLR.
Don't get me wrong though- I'm all for ditching mirrors and the necessary mechanicals/electronics- they are indeed prehistoric,not to mention noisy- and a high resolution viewfinder is fine by me. And if the image quality of the 4/3 sensor can just come up to an APS-C sized sensor- certainly in the higher iso stakes- then the G3 would seem like the perfect camera- provided it has fast autofocus and a decent continuous fps rate... ![]() And maintaining "live view" in HQ burst mode would be nice... ![]() Last edited by SIMON40; Jan 13, 2012 at 12:08 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: India
Posts: 274
|
![]()
Has the mirrorless then replaced the DSLRs once for all or just nudged them a bit?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|