Go Back   Steve's Digicams Forums >

LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old Nov 16, 2008, 8:46 PM   #11
Junior Member
Frood's Avatar
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 1

I've been researching them both. They are reviewed as excellent , but the FZ28 comes out on top most of the time.
Frood is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov 18, 2008, 11:54 AM   #12
Senior Member
Narmer's Avatar
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,813

Maybe it was my average-low expectations (have had a FZ20 for years) comparing to my images from the dSLR, but FZ28 has managed to astonish me.

I thought the LOW ISO fine details deletion (owing to NR) would have been worse.
It is noticeable of course, but pictures are still good to very good (THANKS PANA for "-2" camera settings).
I d like to see a 100% crops comparison of FZ28 and FZ50 pics !!!!

Anyway colors are good too.
Chose 0 Satur for panoramic / landscapes pics, -1/-2 for portraits.
Don't much trust AUTO WB (neither on my EOS 40D dSLR):
Kelvin WB is great, it ca nbe checked directly (better from a shady environ).

DYnamic Range and Exposure: both GREAT imo (though there d be more HL clipping problems). I often end up with better exposure on FZ28 than on muy DSLR, because the latter's LCD is harder to evaluate in average or worse (Brightier) light conditions and I seldom use Live view to expose landscapes shots...

I can really tell that, IMAGEWISE and CONTROLSWISE, the FZ28 beats my old FZ20.
The only doubt is if , considering its higher NR, the 10MP FZ28 can really bring out more detailed imagesx than the (5MP !!!) ones from FZ20 !
Will be able to tell more after some more months of usage...


Narmer is offline   Reply With Quote

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 6:59 AM.