Go Back   Steve's Digicams Forums > Digital Cameras (Point and Shoot) > Panasonic / Leica

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old Nov 14, 2006, 10:14 AM   #1
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,066
Default

TheFairest.info is a project to try to find the prettiest image in the world

http://thefairest.info/top.html

Riley
Rriley is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old Nov 14, 2006, 11:05 AM   #2
Senior Member
 
tcook's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 2,703
Default

They are all fantastic photographs and I would love to take just one like any of those but, to me, there will never be one that is the best. I think the best one is always going to be the one I am looking for.
tcook is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov 14, 2006, 1:22 PM   #3
Senior Member
 
bayourebel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,561
Default

While, I do agree that all are fantastic photos, that anyone would love to lay claim to (myself included), I have to wonder how many of them are exactly what the person and camera saw, or what post processing is capable of. While no photo expert, I am aware of what is possible in the world of technology.

Not being critical, because I do try to post process also, although not very successful.
bayourebel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov 14, 2006, 1:48 PM   #4
Senior Member
 
squirl033's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 6,720
Default

looks like some of those are pretty heavily photoshopped, and some, i suspect, are outright fakes... digital art, not photos. still, since they say the image doesn't need to be a photo, it's permissible. is that inspiration? ehhh... nah. anyone who's proficient with Photoshop can create some pretty amazing images, but that doesn't inspire me. check out some of the images on this site, if you want to really be inspired (and humbled! i know i have a LO-O-O-O-NG way to go to match these guys!

http://www.naturephotographers.net/i...g2&u=13379
squirl033 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov 14, 2006, 3:02 PM   #5
Senior Member
 
rhermans's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Antwerp - Belgium
Posts: 3,454
Default

Great images, some might have even started as a photo - but even then originals must have also been inspiring. - Ronny
rhermans is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov 14, 2006, 3:25 PM   #6
Senior Member
 
RuidosoDigital's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 100
Default

PORN CONTENT WARNING.

A several hardcore pornographic images in there, as well as some tasteful nudes.

I'm only impressed with about half the images in general. A lot are mere snapshots of scenes that would be nice if they were done more seriously/professionally.

Definitely a few outright fakes and several highly PS enhanced. Saw a few from NASA, and the Hubble telescope.

Some are superb though.
RuidosoDigital is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov 14, 2006, 3:43 PM   #7
Senior Member
 
D.Ann's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,932
Default

How do you know what is real and what is "faked"...when is photoshop okay and when too much...I can't tell. Donna
D.Ann is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov 14, 2006, 4:11 PM   #8
Senior Member
 
RuidosoDigital's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 100
Default

D.Ann wrote:
Quote:
How do you know what is real and what is "faked"...when is photoshop okay and when too much...I can't tell. Donna
I can't really explain it in words... Experience is the best way to understand; If you play around in your image processing program (Photoshop... {I mostly use PaintShopPro}... PS Elements, GIMP etc.) you will begin to see on your own.

Most of my stuff gets a pretty good workkout using PS techniques, mostly with saturation controls; I like to to make the photo look like what my mind's -eye saw rather than what the sensor recorded.

If a photo seems overly enhanced to ME, a real purist would be horrified.

(Don't judge my work with the junk I have posted here, I'm just learning to use the FZ50, I'm stuck within an few minutes of my house, so subjects have been limited. Have done much better work with my Nikons and Minolta; You can see some of my better stuff on my website,
CafePress .com/southwestphoto or at http://www3.photosig.com/go/users/userphotos?id=80257


"Too much" is in the eye of the beholder. My experience is that people who know little or nothing about photography like the level of PS enhancement I use.... The more people know about photography the less they seem to like my final output... So it depends on who your 'target audience' is that defines "Too Much"
IMHO
RuidosoDigital is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov 15, 2006, 12:33 PM   #9
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 511
Default

Both sites are well worth visiting.

I won't get into the what is a photograph, art, fake as I'm not sure where to draw the lines either.

I love to look at inspiring photos and would like to share one I saw with you good folk.

Its at http://www.ephotozine.com/gallery/excelgallery.cfm

That should take you to their Gallery of excellence. There, you need to scroll down to
to "Most challenged photos" and click on that heading.

You'll see various pictures. The one that grabs me big time is a self portrait of a young lady made up a bit. You can only really see her face. She is actually leaning against a tree as she HAND HOLDS her little Sony to take a self-portrait.

Other photographers challenge these photos of excellence with their own attempts.Most flat suck or worse.




Tazzie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov 15, 2006, 7:07 PM   #10
Senior Member
 
HarjTT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 4,535
Default

Hi Riley

Mate those are simply awesome - jaw dropping stuff ! Need to book a holidya to somewhere exotic !

Cheers

Harj

:? :O
HarjTT is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 2:13 AM.