Go Back   Steve's Digicams Forums > Digital Cameras (Point and Shoot) > Panasonic / Leica

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old Mar 21, 2008, 1:47 PM   #1
Senior Member
seemolf's Avatar
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,255

There are many articles about depth of focus and even more calculators.
But I did not find good data about the unsharp portion of our pictures.

I needed the following comparison for my website.
Maybe someone else would like to see these results too.... (greetings to R.H.)

Even with achromats the bridgecam needs more than 4-times the distances to the background.
The dSLR is miles ahead in this discipline.
..and I believed the tale, that the small sensors give us a better DOF.
This can be compensated to some extent with smaller apertures.

Just look at the comparison:

The focal lengths shown above are not converted to the 35mm equivalents.
A 6mm lens is an extreme "fisheye" and 30mm stay still at the "wide side" of the spektrum.

..and this is real life:

"dSLR" bridgeCam + Achromat BridgeCam "wide"

The first picture is a fake, my dSLR did not see butterflies up to now.
The last one was a difficult task, active butterflies did not accept my scientific approach.
The xacti leaves a small gap of 7cm to the insect.
If I could control the aperture on this toy, even the horizon would be sharp.
A xacti captures everything, except the air ;-)
(all pictures can be expanded - as usual)

I guess, my FZ5 will catch some dust in the next months.
...and my "new" camera does not have a "P" in its name.

This lens cuts like a knife - 180mm

Happy easter!



seemolf is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 4:19 AM.