Go Back   Steve's Digicams Forums > Digital Cameras (Point and Shoot) > Panasonic / Leica

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old Jun 17, 2004, 10:43 AM   #11
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 53
Default

Tiff please!
Ramblin_mo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jun 17, 2004, 11:14 AM   #12
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 130
Default

As a newb, what are the ramifications, speed wise, of using Tiff versus Raw?


cageyman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jun 17, 2004, 2:20 PM   #13
Member
 
jjmead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 37
Default

Given those choices, I would prefer a lower (or no) jpeg compression option
jjmead is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jun 17, 2004, 3:00 PM   #14
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 4
Default

Less compressed best jpg - no tiff - no raw
luckydon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jun 17, 2004, 3:36 PM   #15
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 24
Default

tiff please, even if it produces huge files its better than a compression quality loss format.
Frederico is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jun 17, 2004, 4:20 PM   #16
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 63
Default


Actually I think I would prefer a very low compression jpeg. I had tiff on my other camera and the problem with that is that the files take up so much room. But I wouldn't turn down the offer if that was available. It might come in handy sometimes.
Purrcat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jun 17, 2004, 4:34 PM   #17
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 130
Default

based on conversations here at work, very low jpg compression over tiff


cageyman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jun 17, 2004, 5:21 PM   #18
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 33
Default

Tiff would be a nice addition for sure, but based on the volume of tiff files,I would probably not use itthat much.

A lower compression JPEG format would be my choice. No doubt.

David
ddsm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jun 17, 2004, 5:57 PM   #19
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 19
Default

lower compressionjpg (super fine) for special shooting. Would never use tiff.
jimboat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jun 17, 2004, 6:16 PM   #20
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 21
Default

I would much prefer a lower compression jpeg! I had TIFF capability on my old Nikon CP800 and never once used it - takes up too much space and slower writing. I think it would be difficult for the average person to see the difference between a low compression jpg and a tiff image.
Clint751 is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:02 PM.