Go Back   Steve's Digicams Forums > Digital Cameras (Point and Shoot) > Panasonic / Leica

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old Oct 19, 2004, 10:18 PM   #11
Senior Member
 
bobc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,433
Default

Test2 ISO 100... f4.0... distance 8'


Attached Images
 
bobc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Oct 19, 2004, 10:19 PM   #12
Senior Member
 
bobc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,433
Default

Test 3... ISO 200... f5.6... distance 8'...


Attached Images
 
bobc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Oct 19, 2004, 10:20 PM   #13
Senior Member
 
bobc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,433
Default

Test 4... ISO 400... f8.0... distance 8'...


Attached Images
 
bobc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Oct 22, 2004, 12:11 AM   #14
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 4
Default

Maybe it is worth mentioning that post-processing is usually considered superior to in-camera processing for the simple reason whatever changes are made to the image in-camera cannot be reversed...while in postprocessing you can save your original image and try as many changes as you want...

Also however good the incamera software is, it has some profound limittions compared to postprocessing software - i.e. less memory, over-riding necessity of speed (If it takes 10 seconds to sharpen a post processed image we scarcely notice it, if in-camera sharpening took this long we would be horrified....
rennie12 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Oct 22, 2004, 12:32 AM   #15
Senior Member
 
bobc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,433
Default

rennie12 wrote:
Quote:
Maybe it is worth mentioning that post-processing is usually considered superior to in-camera processing for the simple reason whatever changes are made to the image in-camera cannot be reversed...while in postprocessing you can save your original image and try as many changes as you want...

Also however good the incamera software is, it has some profound limittions compared to postprocessing software - i.e. less memory, over-riding necessity of speed (If it takes 10 seconds to sharpen a post processed image we scarcely notice it, if in-camera sharpening took this long we would be horrified....
I agree with that to a certain extent. But the camera should be able to produce a great picture with the right settings.

I am trying to hone my photagraphy skills, and all the images that I post on this site are straight out of the camera shots with only resizing.

If I happened to get a great shot that needed a slight touching up, then yes, I may tweek it a little (and if I do I will include it in my post).

I guess for me, getting a great out of the camera shot is more rewarding from a photography stand point.

bobc
bobc is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 2:17 AM.