Go Back   Steve's Digicams Forums > Digital Cameras (Point and Shoot) > Panasonic / Leica

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old Feb 28, 2005, 5:05 PM   #21
Senior Member
 
jsiladi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 587
Default

nooner wrote:
Quote:
Jeff...........The firmware update is real easy to do and only takes a few minutes. The real problem may be finding a FZ1.
I imagine that most people who have them are hanging on to them.. I've seen them on ebay as "demos" for under $200.. That of course is a hit and miss type of thing..


fmoore, I knew I bought that 62mm-55mm step ring for a reason.. Just couldn't remember why.. Just kidding, lots of filters for my Olympus OM4 that are 55mm.. Figured why not try some.. Cheaper than new filters.. Thanks again for posting the compare..

I'm afraid we've hijacked the OPs thread.. Quite nice btw.. I've been envious of the IR photos here since Nick posted his great color ones..


Jeff
:G
jsiladi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Feb 28, 2005, 5:25 PM   #22
Senior Member
 
NickTrop's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 2,249
Default

Thank you. Here is "the" site on IR. When you have some time to kill, check it out.

http://dpfwiw.com/ir.htm
NickTrop is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 1, 2005, 12:15 AM   #23
Senior Member
 
smac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Northern California
Posts: 6,103
Default

Tom and fmoore those IR shots sure look cool. It adds a whole new dimension to your photographs. I really like it.

Nice work.

smac
smac is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 2, 2005, 1:18 AM   #24
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 1
Default

NickTrop wrote:
Quote:
I have seen several articles describing taking apart a digicam and replacing the IR filter with clear (optical) glass of the same thickness. One article suggested using three microscope slide covers since each runs approximately 1mm in thickness and most IR filters run between 2.7 and 3mm.
Quote:
Of course, the disadvantage is that you have to be willing to sacrifice your digicam if something goes wrong. I'd suggest buying a used 3x zoom 4 or 5 megapixel camera as a test case since it seems to me that the IR effect works best in wide to short tele zoom ranges.
Quote:
Derek Benner
Quote:
^^^Not bad at all. The issue, however, is that you will have to shoot with extremely long shutter speeds. Cameras with IR blockers, block 70% or more of the infrared spectrum. It would be comparable to shooting indoor infrared candids. It would be exactly like putting on a filter that only lets 30% of the "normal visible" spectrum in.

Is it possible to get a decent shot? Yes.

Will it be easy? No...

Is it worth it? I don't think so, personally. Up to you.

Since you're also shooting outdoors, you will also suffer from motion blur. There should be virtually no breeze or the foilage will blur badly at 1 second and above shutter speeds.
delphidb96 is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 8:51 PM.