Go Back   Steve's Digicams Forums > Digital Cameras (Point and Shoot) > Panasonic / Leica

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old May 22, 2005, 4:59 AM   #1
Senior Member
 
Treemonkey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 628
Default

Hi,

Decided to head into the city and try out the WA lens and I was pretty happy with the results.
It is soft and all images have been sharpened but once that has been done the images look good in my opinion.

All photos taken in "A" mode at ~f5.2

Comments welcome and appreciated.

Treemonkey
Attached Images
 
Treemonkey is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old May 22, 2005, 5:00 AM   #2
Senior Member
 
Treemonkey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 628
Default

2
Attached Images
 
Treemonkey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 22, 2005, 5:00 AM   #3
Senior Member
 
Treemonkey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 628
Default

3
Attached Images
 
Treemonkey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 22, 2005, 5:02 AM   #4
Senior Member
 
Treemonkey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 628
Default

4
Attached Images
 
Treemonkey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 22, 2005, 7:18 AM   #5
Senior Member
 
pappy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 827
Default

nice ones , number 1 is my favorite :|
pappy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 22, 2005, 7:53 AM   #6
Senior Member
 
mtritt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 257
Default

I prefer #2, but I would correct the barrel distortion. There's also a bit of vignetting at the bottom corners. I guess that wouldbe fairlydifficult to fix. #4 is nice, but there's a lot of noise in the sky. Maybe it's a result of resizing for the web. Overall, very nice stuff with some views of Sydney that I've never seen before.
mtritt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 22, 2005, 6:51 PM   #7
Senior Member
 
Treemonkey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 628
Default

mtritt wrote:
Quote:
I prefer #2, but I would correct the barrel distortion. There's also a bit of vignetting at the bottom corners. I guess that would be fairly difficult to fix. #4 is nice, but there's a lot of noise in the sky. Maybe it's a result of resizing for the web. Overall, very nice stuff with some views of Sydney that I've never seen before.
Thanks for the comments

I was hoping to avoid the issue of vignetting with the 58mm thread on the SRW but as I have a 62mm adapter I need a step ring. I tried to remove it from the top corners but didnt bother about the bottom ones. #4 must have been taken at iso 100 rather than 50 (was taking some photos of birds earlier and I forgot to change it back) but I kind of like the effect.

Treemonkey
Treemonkey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 22, 2005, 8:00 PM   #8
Senior Member
 
NickTrop's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 2,249
Default

These are all wonderful! Number one and number four are my favorites. The Raynox 6600 is about as good as it gets interms of WA for a digicam but you do need to do a bit of post work, mostly because it vignettes slightly and the requisite sharpening. Surprised the larger thread size still resulted in vignetting. I would have made the same assumption as you.
NickTrop is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 23, 2005, 3:55 AM   #9
Senior Member
 
Treemonkey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 628
Default

NickTrop wrote:
Quote:
These are all wonderful! Number one and number four are my favorites. The Raynox 6600 is about as good as it gets interms of WA for a digicam but you do need to do a bit of post work, mostly because it vignettes slightly and the requisite sharpening. Surprised the larger thread size still resulted in vignetting. I would have made the same assumption as you.
Thanks for the kind words Nick. I am quite partial to number 4 as well, I may get it printed off.

Treemonkey
Treemonkey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 24, 2005, 2:24 PM   #10
Senior Member
 
LoveLife's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,288
Default

Treemonkey wrote:
Quote:
Hi,

Decided to head into the city and try out the WA lens and I was pretty happy with the results.
It is soft and all images have been sharpened but once that has been done the images look good in my opinion.

All photos taken in "A" mode at ~f5.2

Comments welcome and appreciated.

Treemonkey
My favorite shot is the monorail. The lens adds amild level of distortion and what makes the picture work.

BTW, whatzoom setting were used?

I just completed a study of the most popular lenses used on the FZ10, 15 and 20 cameras. I set up two galleries that show scenes at progressive magnifications using all the lenses. I believe my DCR6600 setup produces less vignetting. Do you agree?



Date Taken: 2005-05-19 09:53:25
Make: Panasonic
Model: DMC-FZ10
Size: 2304x1728
Bytes:821054
Aperture: f/4.6
ISO: 50
Focal Length: 6mm (36mm 35mm)
Exposure Time: 0.0015s (10/6400)
JPEG Quality: fine
Flash: Flash did not fire, compulsory flash mode
Exposure Program: Aperture priority




and I do not use step rings. I guess it is the nature of the product. It was not designed for the camera it just happens to work and work very well. Whether you clone or crop the picture the excellent light transmission, increased field of dimension with mild distortion makes it a winner in my camp. This link will take you to complete series http://lovelife.smugmug.com/Other/79692.

If you do want wade through the complete sequence your can enter a search for DCR6600, DCR250, DCR1540, DCR2020, Tcon 07, Tcon 14B or Leica in the top right corner.


LoveLife is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 7:59 PM.