Go Back   Steve's Digicams Forums > Digital Cameras (Point and Shoot) > Panasonic / Leica

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old Jun 30, 2005, 2:00 PM   #1
Senior Member
 
seemolf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,255
Default

Sorry, had to kill the earlier thread, because the results were not reliable.
Please ignore the answers in this case!

But some of us search through old threads, so here is a substitute:

Measured results for diopter vs. visible field
..and diopter vs. distance

These are reliable - measured results.

Please feel free to add new comments!

Sven



First is the (minimum) long axis in cm FZ5 12* telezoom compared to diopter


Next the distance front lens to object:


again an exponential relation.

I took the diopters published by the manufacturers, they are not reliable.
The curves would be better with measured diopters.
22 diopters is a reversed SLR lens.

[img]file:///E:/daten/foto/threads_own/macroTable_dateien/attachment.jpeg[/img]

seemolf is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old Jun 30, 2005, 2:27 PM   #2
Senior Member
 
ukwoody's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 190
Default

I haven't got the foggiest clue what it is you've done but it looks impressive!:?

Woody
ukwoody is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jun 30, 2005, 3:08 PM   #3
Senior Member
 
seemolf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,255
Default

Hello ukwoody,

you can determine the maximum distance and compare reproduction ratios of different close up lenses.
It might help some macro freak, if (s)he wants to use or even to buy a specific lens.

.... if there is a bug in this thread, please report it!



seemolf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jun 30, 2005, 3:56 PM   #4
Senior Member
 
ukwoody's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 190
Default

HI Seemolf, thanks for explaning that, it's damn clever. But I'm not sure who is the sadder person... the one who works it out, or the one that wants it:G.

I like your dry sense of humour with the bug!



Woody
ukwoody is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 1, 2005, 9:16 PM   #5
Senior Member
 
boyzo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,544
Default

The Data Table is excellent work.

The Bug shot is A cool macro .....A1
boyzo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 2, 2005, 8:45 PM   #6
Senior Member
 
seemolf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,255
Default

Hi ukwoody.

only the bug is really sad that I finally did find the focus.
Just see the tear at his side!
seemolf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 2, 2005, 8:52 PM   #7
Senior Member
 
seemolf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,255
Default

..
seemolf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 2, 2005, 9:35 PM   #8
Senior Member
 
Charlie46227's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 295
Default

And he even found a bug inscribed with a 'W' on it's head just for you Woody ! :-)

ukwoody wrote:
Quote:
HI Seemolf, thanks for explaning that, it's darn clever. But I'm not sure who is the sadder person... the one who works it out, or the one that wants it:G.

I like your dry sense of humour with the bug!



Woody
Charlie46227 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 2, 2005, 9:44 PM   #9
Senior Member
 
seemolf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,255
Default

Did not see that, but I swear it´s not a fake!!
seemolf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 2, 2005, 10:13 PM   #10
Senior Member
 
seemolf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,255
Default

Charlie,

I must confess most of my bugs are in love with "W"oody.
But let us take this one from today, which rather looks like a "V".
This is hard flash light from the FZ5, does anybody like this?

seemolf
Attached Images
 
seemolf is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 9:28 PM.